I disapprove add them too to be honest, but because frankly it will push the power scale to much in BRV
Yea no the amount of Stuarts and players using BR 2/3 kit is genuinely concerning at br5. It makes playing against the US at BR 5 feel like a br2 game but maybe one person on the other team has br5 kit.
Yes the Tiger II still outclasses the Super Pershing
they need now a bether tank to counter thr super pershing, bether smgs. alsou a more manuverebel bomber .
heavy tank no.6 for japan when
1 Like
Min/max’ing Germans are impossible to make happy
they will seal club japan ofc
I’m honestly confused as to why DF added this specific super Pershing. Not only does it have a worse powertrain, but it also has a longer reload since it’s quite frankly a joke to expect one person to load the round.
just to further clarify. i already mentioned that longer belts were used in MMG configuration where mg42 was used as fixed emplacement or as vehicle gun. as LMG it used 50 round linkable belts, 50 round drums or 75 patronentrommel drums.
also i hate how MG actually work in this game cause i think that most MG(regardless of nation) should not have more than 50 round belts without being in fixed position.
1 Like
Because it’s the most iconic Super Pershing
first M3 for soviet now mg42 for us? whats going on?
nice
who needs super bazooka when we can copy stuff for every faction?
3 Likes
These aren’t just mere sidegrades. They provide an objective niche that Germany’s current firearms do not have right now.
The Raketenwerfer has 200+ armor pen so it would be significantly more powerful than the Pak-40 AT gun.
The K/31 used detachable magazines and had a straight pull bolt meaning it fires and loads significantly faster, attach a scope and this thing would be great for BR2 or BR3.
The Wimmersperg Spz had a better fire rate than the STG and was lighter and smaller than it’s original counterpart. In-game this could translate to faster deploy speed and improved stamina.
The M1916 would be a drastic improvement over the G43 and ZH-29 due to it’s 20 round box mags.
The MG-81 has a fire rate of 1600 rpm and used large 250 belts. This is everything the in-game MG-42 wishes it could be and the double barrel variant could absolutely shred apart infantry considering it’s original AA purposes.
1 Like
It is nice to be able to equip the U.S. with an assault rifle that is easy to use.
The Thompson .30 caliber is my favorite, but it’s time for an update.
2 Likes
Is this one not a balance problem but more a matchmaking one? This situation also happened for Germany and USSR (I didn’t play Japan for a while). Things can reverse if matchmaking system put Pz. IV and M26 together.
well, just like japan and the us from alot of updates, they can just learn to wait a bit longer for events, or other updates containing sidegrades.
us literally survived for the most part through premies, later introduction which were much needed, and japan starved from a long time.
no one is entitled to anything.
especially when we have factions that aren’t really equal to others.
beside, you can just… sit back and enjoy the toys you have earned.
want something new? mods are there for everyone to keep them selves busy.
( i reccomend that. it’s what i did. and the editor truly keeps your self busy up until updates ).
complaining about not getting stuff when you have planty of tools to play with, serves no one.
even your self.
( but as stated, you are free to point that out if you think it’s an issue. a bit weird… considering in the last few months, we literally got more toys. but whatever. you do you ).
which in the future can be adjusted or new planes introduced accordingly.
there’s always enough time.
well, ugh…
no offense, but you’re not that far off different from them with some of the opinions and logic that you use.
like everytime someone tries to make a german suggestion, you just bust in and say no. to then leave without any meaningfull conversation.
and when you do;
" they don’t deserve them ".
" effe them ".
not… entirely any better if i have to be honest.
as someone who plays all factions, i think everything could, and should be implemented as long makes sense( even if it doesn’t, devs will anyway ). especially if not stronger / meta. but cutsey sidegrades.
hell i’m like a radical lefty of modern us politics but for gameplay.
diversity and inclusion is good.
( i’m primarily speaking for gameplay though )
5 Likes
I still want my Nebelwerfer or R4M rocket pod mounted onto a cargo truck or my BF-109, JU-88 and ME-410 with Werfer Granate 21.
5 Likes
TO BE FAIR, I am almost never serious and do that for my own amusement
But everything else you’re saying I second
that’s the designation for the rockets
it’s not 21 rockets
1 Like
Right but DF could easily add both - as more T26E3s were converted, it goes to TT and the one T26E1 that was converted should be premium/event.
For me mainly Stuh 42, Brummbär, and the “Nahverteidigungswaffe” equiped with HE grenades for those tanks that had it. Infantry does have what it needs. But planes could still profit from getting the fw190 finaly fixed.
1 Like