Weapons and vehicles of the "Tigers of Burma" update

so they saw the USA doesnt have any anti tank equipment past br3 so they decided to fix it while japan doesnt have any AT equipment past br2

instant win button?

2 Likes

apparently… :upside_down_face:

No, if the USSR and USA had more consistent winrates against the Germans, the devs would barely care to update their TTs with shiny new BR5 equipment and vehicles. It’s due to the fact that Germany wins too much that the devs think that the Allies need to be beefed up instead of realizing that it’s inevitable that some factions are more popular than others.

1 Like

it super obvious it the Maus and ME262 of course how could you forgot

Yes its really apreaciated.

This is how you handle feedback from players. Unlike the hole gold order situation. I feel some renewed optimism about the game.

1 Like

an actual rocket tank for starters?

1 Like


image
Panthers for everyone

1 Like

How nice of you to remind me.

Still no Indians. No Canadians either.

2 Likes

Every faction is missing things. It’s simply your turn to get your handheld by darkflow. Japan could’ve used functional high BR AT and CAS more but allies are a larger player base with a worse winrate so they get the attention.

Are you going to do a combined sale similar to the two new tanks?

Huh, speaking of BFV, their MG 42 should be 981 RPM + 250 rds or 1200 RPM + 150/50 rds.

I did agree with the idea, but the sad thing is we got Allies RPzB and Axis KE-7 here, so that’s not devs’ idea.

of the ww2 battles in the game where would they be

Panther to Italy too

17331600439587549072274552136299

2 Likes

I already knew about the tigers living in Burma, but thanks for the info about the Japanese general, I did not know that one !

i can’t prove or disprove it.

i do imagine win rates to affect shifting of content or decisions.

i don’t think that’s the case.

and not to play devil’s advocate, but they do things based on necessities.

i mean, i don’t think you can really argue against them getting a better anti tank weapon, or “better” tanks. they are just on par with the counter parts ones.

which again, it’s what they openly stated. they want to make this game balanced. ( i should use the " " )

one thing is clear though, they do know how to advertise their premies though.
inspite of win rates.

and, they are dragging it for the long with each update…

i remember when we used to get 7 items for just 1 campaign back in the days…

but beggars can’t be choosers.

although, as stated, germany does not need anything new.
and their win rates or loosss for that matter, won’t change that.

which it’s why “we” keep getting sidegrades. over and over.
because we already have meta stuff.

Flase
mvfKGQXko_SErqS3kzzkP2PPDR-6uzwV5JTOS8DLerQ
Okay he is Hungarian, but he is clearly carrying 200 round if not more for his MG42.
Should we add MG42 with 200+ rounds though, well that is probably too much, especially for TT.

I want the Rakentenwerfer 43 Recoilless Rifle, Swiss K/31, Wimmersperg Spz, M1916 Self-Loader with 20 round mags and MG-81 in either it’s single or double barrel configuration.

How about a Nebelwerfer or R4M rocket pod fitted onto a civilian cargo truck?

I also want a BF-109, JU-88 or ME-410 with Werfer Granate 21 rockets.

Or how about a Panzer III or Tiger I with S Mines launchers?

There’s also the Sturmtiger and Jagdtiger Self propelled guns that I’ve been looking forward to.

5 Likes

no it not too much they said it not me