I would agree if Nations were balanced in all aspects. It is widely understood that USSR have the best infantry, Germany the best tanks, and USA the best airforce. If USA gets a Tiger II in essence, then what advantage does Germany have now? They could have at least given Germany a real Panzerschreck.
Also…
Why did the USA have to get a beltfed MG42 same time as the Germans? They got plenty of other stuff already.
Like the 100rd axis MG proper high tier CAS was a soviet missing link, so both are here - rest of tree seems like filling out JP/USA capabilities, that are missing, which is good. JP mains were complaining about being forgotten for a while.
Also agree, adding a T24 copy to USA is deff throwing shade, it wasnt necessary by any means to be honest. ofc its a fine addition, will see play.
I’d take the MP 40 over the Lanchester. Better recoil
Nah duh it’s a Winchester lever action. Lever actions are absolutely superior firearms to bolt actions! This is like comparing an auto rifle to an LMG. It’s just better in every metric
I’ve unlocked it. It’s fun to use and slaughters when on the bipod. My main complaint for it is the fact the vertical recoil is entirely uncontrollable. The gun WILL go up. But that’s countered with burst fire or mounting. It’s still a fun MG to use
Eehhh well even with the comparisons there’s still a clear victor. Tiger II can shoot the Super Pershing wherever it darn pleases to kill it. Super Pershing’s still gotta aim for certain weakspots to weaken and kill the Tiger II
So this is just the American update, isn’t it? I guess Japan and Germany do get some necessary filler content but this just seems like it’s made with USA in mind and everyone else an afterthought.