Weapons and vehicles of the "Jet Power" update

[CaptainSebekel]

so they also gonna fly 400kmh most of the time and 500 if they have a good day?
Cool

[MagnaWedge]

If you think the US BR5 M1919A6 is bad or makes it basically not a class, you are quite ill informed on the power of sustained bullets from that weapon.
I would agree with your points to a far less exaggerated extent, them adding in jets is not killing infantry gameplay. There is plenty of good things for infantry and if you are just being farmed, you need to think about ways to deal with your situations better, only farming is unfortunately timed bombing of rally points.
AA guns as they stand are still quite strong against planes, without much the planes can do against them.

[khtk395]

@Adamnpee

Stop lying xD what’s so armored that they needed higher penetration AT launcher?

Jumbo on br4.

[James_Grove]

@Mopuit

Guess the jets will break the balance of the game with their introduction.

They are not so different from other planes, you will see it soon enough!

[Listkom]

@MajorMcDonalds

The new Japanese rocket launcher is needed here and now for the balance of the game, as countless of you have asked for it over time. Other Japanese options were often not as well-used. Developers need to observe many images and blueprints (and there are not that many of them for other anti-tank weapons) in order for them to be modelled and hence added to the game. Perhaps others can be presented to developers for later, but for now, this will at least help the balance for Japan in high-BR matches.

When you were making your videos about this game, is this what you wanted for it? Stagnation to the level of War Thunder with trophies of trophies and clones of clones? With clownish, objectively weak events. With the cutting of subfactions, one of which is depicted on your avatar. With a complete lack of at least imaginary historicity. You know perfectly well, I am sure, that there were Soviet jets before 1946. I will help you list them - MiG-9, I-250, Bi-1, 302p and others. It was simply unprofitable for you to model them. As well as to model a new grenade launcher for Japan… having made a trophy of a trophy… Now reap what you yourself have generated. I hope you are happy now.

[Yamoto4299]

@GasMasters

type 97 AT rifle with experimental Ji Te Dan
A special armour piercing grenade fired from the Type 97 anti tank rifle,around 250mms of penetration,this would be a nice deterrent to high BR enemy armour

BR5

It’s literally a type 97 with a charge on the end, it’s really not that hard to add.

[Comet92220]

So we had to wait six months for 3 random infantry weapons to be added, one copy-pasted rocket launcher and a bunch of jets to be imported from War Thunder ?

[MasterGrey]

What a clown show… BR 5 going to be horrid than ever before.

This game is going under at this rate, hope those that keep making these retarded suggestions are happy.

[MagnaWedge]

Got some good points, but the personal attack on Major as if he is the sole man in charge of the game is completely unwarrented really. He is a glorified PR man, not Mr Gaijin himself. Don’t be so rude.

[yulin0128]

No, I still quite like the Browning 1919, but that is the ONLY option for BR V USA right now
we never got a 50 rd mg, or something that shoots faster(discounting premium)
when germany got 3 BRV MG now and 2 BR IV options
Isn’t it weird to add another to germany when there is so much that could be added to the allies TT?

[PdT_ColinBraune]

the me 262 A 1a also had never a bomb. the variant that is showen is the A2 and also carryed 2 500 kg bombs. the me262 that is showen ther was never used like this and is compleatly incoreckt. the A1 variants where only fighters but the A2 veriants where bombers/ atteckers.

[MagnaWedge]

That’s a fair point, you should’ve articulated it like that in your original post. Instead of going straight to the extremes of saying it basically doesn’t exist.
I agree, let’s add a British BR5 MG!

[Listkom]

I agree. But sometimes I want to hear an honest answer from him. Working for Gaijin now he can’t answer honestly. That’s the irony.

[Comet92220]

It is indeed named SU-9 : but it is a prototype from 1946

Sukhoi Su-9 (1946)

[Count_Smarald]

I am very skeptical of these jets … i know that many asked but the speed jets are assumed to bring aren’t conducive to being anything more than guided missiles in small maps … I hope I’m wrong … but giving bombs on top of their speed and cannons just seems like guided missile spam to come.

[MagnaWedge]

Early jets perhaps weren’t as fast as you imagined, especially at low altitudes. So I personally am not worried, but if they changed the stats for enlisted, then I share your concerns…

[Comet92220]

Manually guided cruise missile designed to destroy grey zone tanks

[RyzerTech]

Not every faction should have “everything” for the sake of balance. its not our problem if “Historicaly” they did not have any “counter” you guys should focus on historical not the absurd things for the sake of balance but who cares lol

[khtk395]

@PdT ColinBraune

will the german me262 be in a fighter squad ore in a bomber squad? because it has a bomb so its the bomber/ attecker aircraft and not a fighter. so it needs to be in the squad where the fw190D12 is inside and not in the squad where the bf109 K4 is inside. its not a fighter aircraft animore.

Your theory doesn’t even make sense consider many fighter in game has bomb or rocket.

[SzepWaxweiler]

@James_Grove

“Uragan” SMG (BR II)

Very interesting looks a lot like TM 44

BTW what about new premium squads or pre-order bundle