well, long time no see fellow old forum dweller.
anyway, when it comes to the suggestion and topic at hand…
eh… i don’t know.
personally, i think it’s fine as it is.
( but not opposed for improvements as long others see the benefits of it or devs thinks alike )
they should get bigger magazine, but they should also lose body armor damage reduction. currently AVT has bigger killing potential vs fg42 if they are wearing body armor.
Long time no see, Erika. I wouldn’t post it if its all right. It feels highly uncomfortable
I prefer give body armor for axis
i prefer no body armor cause it ruins gun balance and gives advantage to veterans and p2w people.
Indeed SF need some improvement or have their own space/class… Currently and tell me if I’m wrong, they just stole the place of any other small arms fire of the game for how Universal they are
I prefer more variety so it can be in game but reduce speed of character. Maybe dramamticly.
Only if avt dmg is reduced to FG level but that most likely is not what you want.
Damage still balanced by very high recoil. I ll be fine if it will be equal to T20
Giving body armor to axis will not solve the 1 shoot 2 shoot problem we currently have between the FG and the AVT.
recoil does not matter as much if you just tap fire.
As I say It be fine for AVT to be equal with T20. 20 rounds, damage, recoil.
Also. RPM 700 fo AVT40
But the T20 cant be paired with body armor. FG isnt able to 1 shoot if wearing body armor while the avt can still do that. So giving body armor is not equalising the playingfield.
It be fine to have body armor for everybody
And soviets have worst auto rifle(
Because it would mostly just affect german weapons with their weapon breakpoints and leave allied weapons mostly as they are now?
Because more content is good choice. Not to took something away
