Oh yes damn had not even realised. Well their both in a shitty situation I guess.
well japan actually has 2 BR2 rifles, just that one of them is on BR3. also 5 bullets in SA rifle is so bad that it is better to use BA rifle instead. soviets wont be any better or worse with BR2 SA rifle.
best BR1 smg, best BR2 smg, best BR3 smg. certainly less stuff, but it is way better stuff.
well with this i agree. soviets have shit low BR MG.
quantity doesnt mean anything if it comes without quality.
1 Like
Your missing the point. Both factions, Japs and Soviet, have a severe lack of stuf in their TT. He only pointed out that Soviet has so little stuf that even Japs have more stuf. Which, to be honest, is a race to the bottom because both have the same problem; lack of content.
So let me be clear, no I dont think Soviet should be buffed, I am saying that im getting bored of playing the same weapons all the time. I want weaker weapons I dont care, just something else to play with. Same for Japanese, although the problem for them is bigger on high BR and BRIII.
This is not only for weapons but also a problem with maps. So, US getting all the TT stuf is sort of well … bullshit. I hope Japs and Soviet get some more stuf next update.
2 Likes
My opinion is this. The AVS and AVT have their standard magazine capacity as it was in real life. That should remain
But if there is some historical precedent for more magazines, they can be added as a variant
1 Like
it is not that they have lack of stuff, but that germans and US have too much unnecessary stuff. germans have italian, czech, finnish, french and hungarian equipment, while US have british equipment and both nation have lots of variants of same rifles(e.g. kar98k, carcano, springfield m1903, thompson, BAR etc. ). soviets on other hand dont lack anything(with exception of BR2 SA rifles for those who care) and they dont have lot of useless filler making their grind harder.
only japan currently needs equipment to fill stuff that it lacks or to replace overtiered equipment. everyone else is ok(germany also needs lot of stuff moved to folders from mandatory grind).
1 Like
I agree Germany might have to much to grind. But soviet lack variety, thats also a problem. They might have good stuf, but it gets boring. Its not only about power level
3 Likes
Soviet mains use lack of variety as an ecxcuse, I don’t see them begging for lend-leased weapons, captured weapons or commercial weapons like Japanese mains do.
2 Likes
i welcome any equipment into TT that is foldered and wont break balance. if soviets can get something interesting, then go for it. but what do soviets actually have that is not in TT regarding infantry equipment? 50 different mosin variants? ww2 prototypes of post ww2 guns? lend lease? some ww1 or pre ww1 equipment that was not used in ww2?
Yeah well, lets start by not making everything an ‘event’ thing
I am not a soviet main. I am basing this all on the fact that I play all factions and, although greatly liking Soviet, slowly drifting away because they lack variety.
Also this argument is sort of void. We know there are less Soviet players that German. Soviet mains have good reasons to complain, because their faction lack player making their experience bad. So if variety is a possible reason, than they might want to blame that.
1 Like
I have heard that there is a clipper version of the DP27, which would be noice for BR2 since the Madsen is ahistorical and sucks ass. Dont know how historical the clipper thing is but at least cant be worse than the Danish MG.
Madsens were bought buy russians pre-war (I think maybe ww1 cant remember TBH ) and were used extensively by soviet so its not a-historical
And by DP with clippers I assume you mean Kubynov hopper-fed DP27/8 which was just a prototype but nonetheless its a good 
idea for BR2 MG
2 Likes
There are of course many messages here, but here, I found one for you. The preserved 20-round magazine was found at the site of the fighting.
It seems I also saw photos from the front, where this 20-round magazine was clearly visible.
1 Like
5k were bought by the Russian Empire, most were lost during WW1 and the Civil War. They had more Feds than Madsens.
And I couldnt find any WW2 picture of a Russian soldier using a Madsen (or English source) but German soldiers. At best vague anecdotes of Russian partisans using it behind the frontlines in early 1941.
Maybe there is one and I missed it.
1 Like
Hmm makes sence I couldn’t find any soviet ww2 picture with Madsen but anyway even if it wasnt used it was bought and to some degree was fielded anyhow this this let me to find a new Machine hun for BR2 soviets DPM-36
This one is paratrooper version there is belt fed variant ,too
And this here is standard variant
2 Likes