IRL it was a better AT gun, but 90% of tank targets are infantry and it was not good vs them - even more so because the Valentine IX lost the coax machinegun - so it didn’t have a machine gun at all!
Some sources say there was a UK Shell Mk X that had 590gm of HE filler - but I haven’t found anything original about that.
I wonder if all these very high volumes of HE filler are actually misrepresented from weight in pounds rather than kg?? Ie someone has taken 0.59lb and thought it was 0.59kg …??? 0.59 lb would be 267 grams.
the amount of miscalculations units of measurement have caused, I wouldnt be suprised.
My opinion of the gun is not based on anything historically, I would be inclined just to agree with what you have found as you go to great lengths in the research of them.
My thoughts on it are purely from and ingame persepctive from Warthunder and Enlisted
I dont know what it is, but I have found the 6 pound HE in enlisted effective enough with a decent reload on the crusader and Churchhill. I am quite fond of it
75mm HE might be strictly the better HE shell (75 solid shot is trash)… but I know I would still choose the 6 pounder over it for alround capability in game
At least from my personal experience, the 6 pounder in Enlisted is a worse gun both against infantry and tanks. I’m not actually confident that it has better armour pen than the 75mm like in WT but, even if it does, it just seems to experience way more jank when shooting against other tanks compared to the 75mm even without APHE.
It has a fair bit more pen but half the mass (roughly). Since all solid shot is dog shit after pen damage its more about hitting the right spot (ammo rack). I just favour the 6 pounder with its slightly more pen and RoF