So my matches against the Soviet Union are usually full, no problem finding a game and the Russians also have really good weapons (only the AVS and ATV are perhaps too weak compared to the Fg 42, which is compensated for by the bayonet and higher damage and muzzle velocity, every weapon has strengths and weaknesses) since the King Tiger is considered the best tank it is understandable but getting there is annoying because the start and mid tier tanks are completely vulnerable due to the lack of sloped armor. The German planes are not really better because their bombs are not as strong against infantry and generally have a rather low bomb load on each BR. Probably superior in terms of firepower, but not as maneuverable as the Russians. If people donāt know how to play what, thatās a different problem, but as I said, my rounds are almost always full of good opponents. I once stole a Federov as a guerrilla, itās a good weapon for close and long-range combat, the recoil is exhausting at medium range but realistically its one-hit capacity is important. Ps: The Soviets have access to the bazooka and all anti-tank weapons, what more could you want (didnāt they develop their own?)
Sorry Panzerfaust not bazookas
Right here
The translator did not write what he wanted, sorry. But I meant the opposite. It was the super Pershing that destroyed the Panzer IV, not the other way around.
if you have japan BR5 then that is your best bet for easy win. lots of time i dont even have to play for my team to roflstomp US team.
Equipment is not the problem and never was, there are just no players playing soviets at BR 5.
You can get good teams at low BR though and there is a bigger selection of maps aswell so its more interesting to play.
Its the opposite for USA, low BR is dead but BR 5 is quite alive.
Focusing on equipment and blaming it for bad teams and losing is just dumb, it really makes no sense.
Some sort of matchmaking improvements need to be done instead, like making stacks only fight each other and making sure there is an equal amount of players on both teams that have the same BR equipment.
In 2.5 years I have only played 30 games with the Japanese so I am far from level 5. I am just starting to get into the level 2 tech tree. I have the Allies and Germans tech tree finished and almost have the Soviets. So, the last few days I have pretty much played mostly level one Japan. I guess if level 5 is that easy I could use my level one Japs. 
I know when I play level 3 allies and get the Japanese I end up playing against level 5.
BEO WHAT DID I WAKE YO TOOš dawg look soviets are know for being the most braindead faction ever and it sucks but its honestly not even close to bad like we have everything we could want literally
i had ~80% WR with japan BR2. after i started playing BR5 it went up to ~88%. difference was that in BR2 i had to carry lots of game and in BR5 lots of times i was in middle of scoreboard cause there are lots of tryhards.
just for comparison my german BR5 WR is ~75%
This problem can be solved better by increasing the number of players in the matchmaking mechanism. In each game, Germany will always have 2 to 3 more players than the USSR.
This problem can be solved more easily by making the number of players on both sides equal
Yea, most likely.
Winrate had nothing to do with strength of nation. Itās about community of game.
WR is best showcase of current strength of faction. when merge happened i had >95% WR with germans and they were roflstomping everything. currently japan has best players on BR5, while germans, US and soviets are hit or miss depending on server/time of day.
This got to be a problem, sovs free players demand a lot to put 0 rubbles on the gameā¦ At least buy the devs a coffeeā¦
Not really. BAR is just as good as an FG 42. In some of the most literal senses possible. Lol
Are there false flags and people who cry wolf simply because of a username? Absolutely
Is there a culture of āwin no matter what, including cheatingā in Chinese culture? Also absolutely. Look man thatās just how it is
RPG-1 was a massive failure and the RPG-2 off of my memory I think wasnāt fully developed before the end of the war. Or some crap like that
decide, is it too weak or can it be compensated?
I personally think the BAR A2 is the best mg in the game, and I use it in all my level 5 squads as opposed to the Stinger or the Browning. It would be perfect at level 5 with a 40 round mag. That being said, the M1 Garand is really outclassed at level 5. The only saving grace I have is that when I play level 3, I usually use four mg squads with BARās and one sniper squad with Garands.
If I had to choose between the FG42 or the BAR? BAR baby. 
I have a LOT of struggle choosing if I like the BAR or M1919A6 more