Write it in a correct german and we can use the translator
To all of you complaining that the English section is toxic, I strongly suggest going to the Russian-speaking part to check it out (Google translate can help).
Believe me, you have a pretty cozy place here.
My conclusion? I bought 2 other online fps in WWI and WWIIā¦I regret, enlisted is definitely the BEST. For free, you donāt have to buy anything, we have the right for very good graphics, soldiers get really critically injured by bombs, bombs who makes big holesā¦Reallyā¦THE BESTā¦so show a bit of respect, even if you donāt get things you want, but remember that in such a war, to get new socks was a long fightā¦
1 Like
To be fair, you at least bought SG and all these points mentioned by you are in BFV as well which you can buy for 30 shekels or so rn.
I like, enjoy whatever Enlisted for other reasons and I am semi-really surprised that many people do not mention it.
Since the devs finally semi-gave up with advertising the game as realistic in terms of atmosphere, I dare you not to compare real war with this weird child of BFV and RO2.
1 Like
Most of toxics in Russian section are just registered. I cant name a singe regular user who is a toxic.
114040769 ?
Almost 4500 batles and I still have no regrets for the time and money I did spend on this game.
Still fun.
Still a decent game to waste my evenings.
But the messiah knows the way
4 Likes
True, Enlisted is a good game overall, it become a bad game wen we start see the unexpressed potential
Iād like to offer my perspective as someone who has been a moderator here since April 2021, and who was a War Thunder moderator for 12 months several years ago.
For those of you who have been a member of both forum communities, you might be aware that generally the Enlisted forum has a more relaxed, less strict form of moderation. From the perspective of most online communities, under-moderation is better than over-moderation. However, if a forum has relatively light moderation, the community - rather than viewing the moderators as the source of antagonism - tend to turn to each other instead and engage in personal feuds. Neither is ideal, obviously, and a balance needs to be struck.
The style of moderation on this forum worked very well for a long period of time here; mostly because the game had a relatively small, tightly-knit online community for some time. Now, almost two years later, the number of players and active contributors has increased, and so has the amount of non-productive content. More people that arenāt deeply passionate about the game but perhaps play casually: this is of course no problem in and of itself, but it means that a smaller proportion of overall forum content is what might be considered particularly useful or productive from the perspective of someone who deeply cares about the game, but thatās the nature of a large community.
The moderation team is still quite small and - generally speaking - somewhat lenient. Permanent suspensions are very rare here. During my time here, Iāve made an effort to engage personally with users, whether that be related to moderation or the game itself. This is much harder when the community is large, and whenever that lenient style of moderation is taken for granted.
If there are two pieces of advice that I can give to everyone to make the forum a better place. First, report someone for breaking the rules, not because you disagree with them. It is very tempting to do, but it massively increases the backlog of work in the moderation terminal with very little discernible benefit, for the staff or the users.
Second, when you realise a discussion is becoming personal - rather than productive - shift the line of discussion or stop engaging with whomever you are becoming personally embattled with.
The staff here are not perfect, there is no such thing. There will always be some moderating errors, and there will always be a minority of the player base that habitually causes arguments or disorder. Itās up to that majority of the community who may very occasionally engage in rule-breaking but are generally here to contribute constructively that need to meet us halfway.
10 Likes