Plus of course those accuracy tests are done on test benches so that there is no input from a human being - it is solely down to the mechanics of the rifle, and not the user.
And yes - it is not “Real world” - like so much of the game it is “balance” not history.
And it is still not particularly bad at all - we are not playing a “real” wargame/simulation - we are playing an arcade run 'n gun.
If you want more “Real world accuracy” try Hell Let Loose or something like that.
you are right. we are playing a game However, the increased bullet dispersion didn’t make the game even better. There are users who do not feel uncomfortable with bullet dispersion, but more and more users think it is inconvenient. Bullet dispersion will only increase the number of players who find the game unpleasant.
Well Bullet spread didn’t make game more balanced and gamey. They even nerfed Bolt-Action rifles. This nerf makes Bolt-action rifle useless. There is no advantage compare to Semi-Auto or Automatic rifles. It spreads anyway, why are we have to use bolt actions? Just shoot more bullets until enemy hits.
I said last post, If you Bullet Spread lover just play Battlefield 1. It is another good game.
I assume they did more than they wished. Though this comment does not suggest they will reduce it back to original, so it can become worse as well.
<away taking some reading comprehension lectures>
Why don’t you ask @Keofox? I have no idea, I’ve just read a related comment and forwarded the news.
I hope they won’t keep balancing things this style.
