I don’t know man, it looks like a nerf for me due the tiny mag.
ngl seems that the logic of more rof = more recoil doesnt apply to this gun so overall it got a better rof along an alredy good control
just a 20 bullets mag and it would totally screw the FG42
2 Likes
I don’t really play the soviets, I am not even saying that is bad or good, just my opinion.
Oh no, please don’t introduce it, it will definitely be better than my FG 42-2, no - the Germans must win, just don’t introduce it.
If you equalize and increase the rate of fire by another 50 points, then I’ll be forced to switch factions. Oh noooo.
1 Like
where did you see that i oppose it? i said that i dont care and that most opposition comes from soviet mains.
also most popular suggestion for fg42 asked increase ROF to 900 with upgrades and decrease fg42 2 to 750 with upgrades.
for me actual buff is decrease of ROF for fg42 2.
3 Likes
You got it backwards, eheh.
It was russian mains who first requested fg42 too high rof, while wehraboos did not want it higher.
What was most wanted was equalized damages amongst similar rifles.
1 Like
Don’t talk nonsense, I have read the topic and none of the German main players who debated with me opposed it.
Review:
Only the main players of the Soviet Union is opposing this topic.
In the current topic, these guys who believe that high rof is debuff have not opposed the FG42 of 900 rof.
Their topic came AFTER some red parrot suggested rof changes only.
They constructed it in a smart way: a give & take one.
Because only asking for buffs seldom ever works… their real goal was the damage normalization of FGs. As a compromise there would be rof tweak.
Thankfully the damage suggestion passed. It was about time balance got restored a little.
2 Likes
Since the soviet mains believed that high ROF was an advantage, why did they give Germany this advantage? Since we believe it is harmful, why do we agree to increase rof?Your logic itself is flawed.
What we see is that he raised this topic, and both harm and rof were realized.
The developers followed his suggestion instead of the non-existent Soviet mains who suggestion to increase rof.
Don’t baselessly accuse other players here.
The author clearly has programs that are prohibited in the game, as there is no legitimate way to gain such recoil control.
1 Like
Technically there is by using perks. We’ll look into it though.
Confirmed. Looks fine.
Really? Did you also check other replays of this guy?
If cheating can be determined solely through two squatting shots in the training field(I can even notice some differences between the second shot and the first shot), then we may need to attach hand recordings when uploading similar videos in the future. XD
…
They did not.
That’s the point…
you did first, here:
I simply said it was the other way around.
…
But, if you (wrongfully) believe this is a buff, I won’t stop you and even be happy for you, eh.
What about the evidence? Which Soviet main has requested the 990rof FG42?
If you can’t even find this guy, there’s no need to continue arguing.
The squatting stance can reduce 30% of recoil, and when paired with the vertical recoil reduction skill, it can lower a weapon’s recoil to a terrifyingly low value.
go see the main update post from today, and read through it. (he even admits it himself here).
I just like to correctly point out “forum history” stuff. In the end, I don’t care much about the fate of fg42 and avs, as they are SF rifles and I don’t use them too much. was only glad about the damage boost last time, because it made sense to equalize damage values between factions.
I can’t find him from so many topics, screenshots or links.
Another vulnerability, since FG42 already has 990rof, why does he require a higher rof AVS? If you think this is a form of weakening, then why did he weaken the Soviet?
???
You’d better think calmly.