Imagine “flagging” would have worked the same way back in the day when wastedwo… oh dang, better not use this name… might get flagged.
2 Likes
Just for ask, this Just a joke post or some of your post get hidden withaut apparent reason?
1 Like
Haha oh my god, yes I flagged my own first post, which had the following text:
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
5 Likes
That’s some big brain, pro energy! I need to follow suit! They already trying this method on me!!!#$$@
1 Like
It is annoying that you cant see what the hidden post was anymore as 95% of the time it was just a diffrent opinion( sometimes actually worded in a inpolite way) but importent to understand what people where talking about.
4 Likes
1 Like
Some people have started to flag everything posted by specific diffrent user regardless of its content and that is worst part about that.
Some people use it to silence and not to moderate anymore…
4 Likes
tbh if someone really hate someone that much they should just go to the guy profile and put it on ignore forever
i did that to someone long ago (dont know if i undo it now tbh)
1 Like
This is one of the funniest threads to come out of this forum that isn’t Conscript Joe
2 Likes
Thats what I never understood from some lol. They hate you so much and this and that, but they still want your attention or something. When its very easy to block.
3 Likes
I can think of a few people that probably hate me. Potentially mods included. Lol
1 Like
I could say the same. Though it seems to be a polarized opinion. And that’s if one knows who I really am from H&G days. So you aren’t that bad.
1 Like
i think it something in their “giga mind” where they want to absolutely destroy you in an argument but fail so they resorted to flagging
4 Likes
I got plenty of opinions a lot of people round here don’t like, and a lot of people on here want things to happen that will, in my opinion, will ruin core aspects of the game I’ve come to love. I don’t want to see that happen, so I’m as vocal as I can be about being in opposition to those changes in hopes of the devs seeing it isn’t a universal opinion. Those who are unhappy will bark the loudest while those who are content will stay silent. I’ll be the voice for those who are content, and I’ve gotten into it with a good number of people about it
1 Like
Every voice has the right to be “heard”, tho I gotta ask where have you been when the BR system was first mentioned?
How I understand you, you should have been opposed to abandoning the Campaign system, right?
On the Subreddit calling everyone who wanted Battle Ratings idiots. I moved onto here a little bit after
I understood the need for the Merge. However, I was one of the very few who seemed to truly understand how the Preferred Map System would have worked and the value of it despite not even having access to test the darn thing, thank you DF for leaving all of us console players to rot in the unknown. I also play a lot of War Thunder and often bounce between the two games. I know Battle Ratings. I know what they have to offer. I want none of that in Enlisted. I play Enlisted because I LOVE Enlisted. Hands down my favorite FPS game. I play WT out of Stockholm Syndrome and the fact there is literally no other game like it. I don’t want War Thunder: Infantry Edition. I don’t want monotonous X vs X and Y vs Y for every single match. That would make Enlisted incredibly dull and the outcome of every match would more or less be predetermined. I fell in love with the Chaos of Enlisted. There could be M1903’s, Kar98k’s, Stuart’s, Puma’s and M2 Carbine’s, FG 42’s, Jumbo’s, and Tiger’s all in the same match as well as literally everything in between. It was incredible. No one had the same set up. Everyone’s squads were a little different. I had Normandy Allies maxed out and still had an odd Springfield or two in several squads just because I never had a need to upgrade them to something else. But the current matchmaker kind of forces some of that chaos from Pre Merge. You got some BR I’s, some BR II’s, and BR III’s all hashing it out. Meanwhile there are BR III’s getting their crap stomped in by the BR IV’s running for BR V and the BR V mains. It isn’t the same level as Pre Merge, but hey it’s good enough for me to thoroughly enjoy BR III as much as Pre Merge. I love fighting a little of everyone. Bolties, StG nerds, Puma’s Pz II’s, Tiger II’s. I’ll fight everyone the same. Equal rights and lefts for everybody
Now, everyone’s trying to run almost everything the same. All BR X stuff in every squad except for those still working towards the benchmarks. All BR III, all BR V, etc with the exceptions of those of us who either don’t know, don’t care care, or prefer one “lesser” gun to the “superior” gun. For example, I’m working on upgrading the final Assaulter Squad and one of the Mortar Squads. Side note, new TT squads are stupidly easy to upgrade. I get 1-4 upgrades per match and this is an endgame squad? Absolute nonsense. It takes more to upgrade my mid tier Pre Merge tank squad than it does this end game Assaulter Squad. Anyways, that Mortar Squad? BR II. M1903’s and M1 Carbines as well as the Winchester. The Assaulter Squad changes but is usually III with some M1 Carbines on the Riflemen. My AT Squad remains unchanged and is a full III squad. Why is this? Well, I ran out of spare M1 Garand’s and I don’t care enough to buy more just to deck out this random squad. I can take names with a Springfield either way, and I need to work on my M1 Carbine gameplay anyways. It’s the gun I’m the weakest on as far as US guns go. I don’t care I’m not uniformly BR III. I got the skill to make up for it plus I’m not gonna do that well anyways because these aren’t my usual loadouts, so not my usual playstyle
You make everything ±1 BR? Everyone’s identical. Everyone has the same dang loadouts in every match. Everyone’s running that “meta” build. Some will play one faction at one BR boosting its winrate while simultaneously abandoning it at another because it’s “not good enough” or whatever tanking its winrate there. The same thing will happen in every faction. Arguably worse than the current winrate decider of whatever the horde is playing at the moment because at least the horde migrates
I just see nothing good coming from turning my favorite FPS game into War Thunder: Infantry Edition
1 Like
When I see a flood of words, I feel the urge to erect a flag.
1 Like
The system itself might have worked but not the way DF designed it.
It had massive flaws in their design.
- EVERY SINGLE axis weapon sent you to normandy
- Some common items sent you to 4 diffrent sets of maps meaning you dont have any control where you land and defeating the point of preferring.
- Tailoring the to a map was nearly impossible due to every item sending you to at leased two diffrent maps and you need lots of diffrent gear.
These led to a dumpster fire of a testserver where you could hardly escape the meta spam and the feature you where supposed to test didnt even function properly.
What they needed was powerful gear dedicated to a map you could build around and truely neutral weapons (not sending you anywhere else) that you could fill the gaps in your roster with.
How do you build a loadout around equipment like this? Do you put this into your moscow deck and just pray that you get moscow?
Yes P47 beware the apex predator is here.
The devs bombed the test so hard the community despised the system and lost any faith of DF balancing anything around maps. Which is why the simplicity of BR prevailed.
Dont blame the community if it was the fault of the devs on that one.
1 Like
I absolutely understand where you are coming from, yet you know very well that this diverse gameplay only existed because people didn’t unlock the best stuff yet - and ultimately gear would eventually be always picked according to whats the best available.
If 90% of the players unlocked everything, then 90% of the matches would basically be BR5 matches.
I still think that you have a point here.
Outside of tank balance, there isn’t a need to have many BRs, with proper and bold balance changes every class and type of firearm could be useful in its own way, but does it really need to be this way?
I mean many shooters balance sniperrifles to perform great in its own way, realism shooters however make bolt action rifles deal about the same damage as infantry automatic weapons - which is based on the real world, bolt action rifles are obsolete and rightfully perform worse than ARs in basically every aspect.
2 Likes
welcome to the era of snowflakes. where everyone is offended by everything.
you dont like someones opinion? flag the post
you dont like user? flag all posts from that user
are there any repercussions for false flagging? nope. just best trolling tool out there.
5 Likes