I honestly don’t agree with any of his suggestions on the post either. I thought the BR changes on your suggestion were far more logical.
Counterpoint: move marder but leave stug and give him better antitank ammo.
Most are pretty good. Not sure about the panther though.
At one point i did think it was BR5 material just because i think its way better than the tiger (that opinion was formed in warthunder)
But after a while in enlisted i decided tiger does have some worthwhile advantages for enlisted.
- reverse speed,
- less vulnerable on the sides to explosives/smaller bombs
Panthers are slightly tougher headon (still 1 shot kills through mantlet), but weak as piss from any other angle.
And now with IS 1 and 76mm guns been moved down i think Its fine
Plus i am still rooting for firefly to be BR 4 which will punch straight through panther
2 Likes
It is better on those wide maps where you are sniping 600m+
Because on those maps, even your turret becomes quite the troll and can bounce very often. And you can simply chill on the spot and snipe the poor bastards.
But once you get to a map where you have to peak from a corner or fight within 200m (basically every enlisted map). Tiger is better in every way except for penetration
Plus I think Tiger E has munition with better penetration available in War Thunder. (Whereas in enlisted, tiger E uses the same one from tiger h1). So the penetration value doesn’t make such big difference.
1 Like
Its sidegrade to Tiger and most of the time, people pick the Tiger because it can farm infantry easier.
Well, I see some of his points, but I am not sure the Panther, followed by the Yak9k and the Ho-Ri Protoype.
sorta what I was getting at with my reasoning. I pretty much wrote the same thing
1 Like