I never see this comment, but half of this tipe of post can be ignored, took as example some keofox post on game QOL wo are be here soon™ for him, but they never come or come with months of delay
Neither helper know wtfk developers want do
I never see this comment, but half of this tipe of post can be ignored, took as example some keofox post on game QOL wo are be here soon™ for him, but they never come or come with months of delay
Neither helper know wtfk developers want do
Well its a good choice because is boring play same campaigns, same maps and same equipment and maybe it gains more players
Yeah I can see how it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s coming or that it’s not coming or that it’s coming soon or it’s coming later…
It could also be that the leak has generated so much hype that maybe they’re thinking of doing it sooner rather than later just because of that
They haven’t even done anything with the French yet and there’s so many ways they could go with that, or Crete, or Burma, or Syria, there’s just a lot of stuff that they could be doing, which is good for the longevity of the game, I’m just kind of wondering how long it’s been since the last campaign was added
Definitely, the only campaign I’m really keen on presently is Tunisia, but I play the daily challenges which takes me to all of the campaigns with the exception of Berlin which I’m kind of saving and not touching for some later date
Nothing aganaist french but a six time "german vs the world’, probably is gonna to make a lot of playerbase angry
Yes i think that they should put the other campaign in a lot of more months because a lot of people is still grinding other campaigns and it would be a drastically change.
There is an output of 2 campaign at year
Ohh i didn’t know that
Based on last year, Last year was berlin in may and tunisia in august/September, this year stalingrad in april and the (unknow one) maybe in September
Ok so basically maybe in 2 months we are going to have a new campaign
Like three of those campaigns include German/ Axis European stuff.
Maybe its because its getting close to the definition of insanity here but for the love of good…
PLS NOT THE NAZIS FOR THE SIXTH TIME NOW!
We have everything from them here. Early war, mid-war and late-war and the inflation of ahystorical stuff is getting ridiculous.
And Syria? Sry but no one gives a crap about a one month campaign between Nazi France and Free France. Would we even reach level 30?
But there are some reasons for adding campaigns (at least according to Df)
The game is doomed, there will be a point where most people just go play custom games, it sucks in NA, most of the time is one full game, one with like 12 players, with 8 on one team, and a bunch of empty lobbies with 1 or 2 players
Tunisia and Normandy are the best currently. The worst is stalingrad without any doubt
-Adds some doubt-
Well yeah, but if they did Syria it would be the French fighting the British.
And if they did something like Crete, you could have the Greeks and Commonwealth fighting early war Germans and Italians, The interesting thing about the Greeks is of course they used all kinds of different equipment including French equipment and some captured Italian equipment, a lot of opportunity there for new equipment.
I play in North America all the time, I never have any of those problems, but I generally play during the daytime in North America so that might be why.
I think there’s more people playing in Stalingrad/Normandy than Tunisia.
Me personally i don´t like Tunisia (i left it at lvl 3 campaign).
I really don’t want to have to unlock the same weapons on the US side for the third time, I rather they just do a overhaul of the campaign progression system first. Make it so if you play as Assaulter, you earn xp for that class which you use to unlock assaulter weapons. Or something along that.
Where there are more players is in Normandy and Tunisia stalingrad is the worst campaign the maps are bad and on top of that much is paid