I kinda agree we don’t need another campaign as it would create more depopulation and pve…
Unless… the sqadds actually take off from flat tops and we get carrier group fights in airplanes.
Hey! A boy can dream 
1 Like
Maybe you’re right
I thought they said that Guadalcanal was not going to be Next but it was in the pipeline … ?
1 Like
Our fellow modder In the editor have found the minimap, i think is a decisive proof for say, guadalcanal is the next
1 Like
I think that if there are new campaigns coming that that’s a good thing for the game, because eventually players are going to burn through a campaign and once they stop grinding they might not be as interested in playing it, at least that’s kind of my own experience, so a new campaign brings new challenges new equipments new toys…
I think as long as they’re adding new content the game is moving forward
1 Like
There was a comment in a former thread, that said that somebody on high had said that Guadalcanal was not going to be Next…
Which suggests that it was a mistake that it was included in the editor
1 Like
I never see this comment, but half of this tipe of post can be ignored, took as example some keofox post on game QOL wo are be here soon™ for him, but they never come or come with months of delay
Neither helper know wtfk developers want do
Well its a good choice because is boring play same campaigns, same maps and same equipment and maybe it gains more players
Yeah I can see how it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s coming or that it’s not coming or that it’s coming soon or it’s coming later…
It could also be that the leak has generated so much hype that maybe they’re thinking of doing it sooner rather than later just because of that
They haven’t even done anything with the French yet and there’s so many ways they could go with that, or Crete, or Burma, or Syria, there’s just a lot of stuff that they could be doing, which is good for the longevity of the game, I’m just kind of wondering how long it’s been since the last campaign was added
1 Like
Definitely, the only campaign I’m really keen on presently is Tunisia, but I play the daily challenges which takes me to all of the campaigns with the exception of Berlin which I’m kind of saving and not touching for some later date
Nothing aganaist french but a six time "german vs the world’, probably is gonna to make a lot of playerbase angry
1 Like
Yes i think that they should put the other campaign in a lot of more months because a lot of people is still grinding other campaigns and it would be a drastically change.
There is an output of 2 campaign at year
Ohh i didn’t know that
Based on last year, Last year was berlin in may and tunisia in august/September, this year stalingrad in april and the (unknow one) maybe in September
Ok so basically maybe in 2 months we are going to have a new campaign
Like three of those campaigns include German/ Axis European stuff.
Maybe its because its getting close to the definition of insanity here but for the love of good…
PLS NOT THE NAZIS FOR THE SIXTH TIME NOW!
We have everything from them here. Early war, mid-war and late-war and the inflation of ahystorical stuff is getting ridiculous.
And Syria? Sry but no one gives a crap about a one month campaign between Nazi France and Free France. Would we even reach level 30?
But there are some reasons for adding campaigns (at least according to Df)
- Df wants to “test” new stuff there (probably coastal navy)
- Df needs good pr and new campaign sounds nice
- Japan would be actually new and exotic and would attract new players and old ones who are tired of the fifth MP40
The game is doomed, there will be a point where most people just go play custom games, it sucks in NA, most of the time is one full game, one with like 12 players, with 8 on one team, and a bunch of empty lobbies with 1 or 2 players
Tunisia and Normandy are the best currently. The worst is stalingrad without any doubt