Its still an MG - a support weapon with bad movement speed penalties and terrible dispersion and two hit kills, there is no way it will outclass STGs and such even if it had a 300 round belt.
You guys are ridiculous - half of you say that 1200 rpm would be unfair, the other half says its going to be a nerf to the gun. For some reason you are all divided about this topic, while simultaneously being against a change. It doesn’t make any sense.
They are whiners who will look for any excuse so as not to see MG that terrifies them in the game as they should,It doesn’t suit them at all. But ask them about the AT weapons captured in their TT.Or the Prototype (AS-44, T20, Hyde M1944)They will tell you that there is no problem with those weapons Why does he say that he will “bring the Balance” to the game that it so desperately needs Why it benefits them But when it comes to the MG42 It is no longer possible because it does not benefit them. And they give you stupid excuses like “Nobody will use the other squadrons, only the MG ones where there is no point in putting it”, it’s a lot “Wasted ammunition”
Okay so you’re telling me that if the stinger was added to the TT and they gave it 300 rounds this time there wouldn’t be anybody throwing there HYDE away so they can stack machine gunners or literally throw away the T-20 to equip this gun cause the Stinger has terrible dispersion?!?! REALLY
And there’s this thing called pulling out your axe and magically the weight is gone poof you know how easily this gun would be abused if it had 300 rounds and you’re standing here telling me that the STG will outclass this gun😭 buddy you know people can burst or get behind sandbags and set up a bipod and like create there own personal DDAY BUNKER
AHH YES A 250 ROUND GUN WITH A FIRE RATe OF 1500 SCARES ME AND OTHER PEOPLE AND SO THEY WHINE it’s like you don’t even think anymore and just say what ever comes to mind cause what you suffer and just want to ruin others just to break this game THANK GOD no one listens to you.
well i tried to explain this to him in 2-3 topics alongside citing sources for all of that, but he is simply a wehraboo.
i mean if he want that to be a thing he could suggested something like if you go prone and have 1 bot alive you could get your mg to have more round and rof or something but idk how the dev would implement that
it would be like space marine 1 where you get reduce rof when not deploy and increase when deploy (i guess that could work maybe)
you know
The crybabies of the Soviet Union and the United States were always beaten to the point of mental collapse by high-performance machine guns.
Just like FG versus M2
so
As always, the official will make more changes that damage the game environment and history for the incompetence and crying of idiots.
Irs true, sustained fire is almost always better than rate of fire.
yes I actually do believe this. well Stinger is an event gun, but its not as godly OP as people think - its just that compared to other MGs its OP, which means its only decent compared to BR5 meta guns.
The Allies and Soviets are given GERMAN AT Weapons in their TT and there is no Problem, They are given Prototype weapons that did NOT SEE COMBAT in WW2 in their TT No problem They gave ABSOLUTE Supremacy in the Air to the Allies in the Normandy Campaign So that the Axis only suffers spam of BOMBS and ROCKETS for 4 years and goes for another year more But there is no problem for the allies/Soviets Why it doesn’t hurt them,He was given a tank that did not participate in the Normandy Campaign like the Jumbo But there was no problem, it did not harm the Allies. But then Germany asks for planes with bombs and rockets and then yes They care about the balance of the game, where they start crying so that Germany doesn’t receive it The equivalent for Spam in the same way towards allies
It is requested that the Faction that emphasized its MGs in WW2 and should be an Advantage for this Faction.How is Germany You must have your MGs just right to do the MG42 justice. Which is far below the performance it had in WW2 in Ammunition rate and capacity,But they like to cry, Complain where they look for anything Excuse for the Weapon not being Enlisted as it should be If you don’t like the gun just say so And don’t be talking nonsense. From “Why With That High Rate of Fire”, “Ammo Capacity”, “You waste a lot of ammo”, “It’s not necessary”, “You’ll break the balance” It’s funny that I say this LAST because I remind you that you allies, Soviets and partly Japan were screwed. To this Game and on the way Also to Germany But since they harm us there is no problem and in this case Many say it will be incredible,But for its factions, not for Germany. That loses more power In the only vehicle with which we can count on continuous support in the parts What are the Tanks like From the Panzer IV J/H at the time, From the Panther, And the Tiger 1 and 2 Since you are counting on the arrival of Super Pershing ,plus the arrival of the Ofenrohr to the allies, the Panzerfaust to the Soviets And to end on a high note for the Allies and Soviets You also have the Planes to destroy the Tanks,But this does not matter to you, you just want to see how GERMANY battles with the Problems caused by you
It’s amazing how much is explained to them in great detail and they still remain fools.To not accept the Truth ,the Balance for you is that Germany does not have its Armament at 100% as it corresponds to any FactionalThis only applies to the Allies and Soviets. Where have you received Tier IV-V weapons
What a silly way to refer to someone who disagrees with your “alleged claim” that German MGs did not have that rate of fire. And the ammunition capacity when they could perfectly carry it and more In this GAME
yea and jap can have 20kg AT on their back
Plus 1800 Vickers bullets plus the 100 from the Gun,The gun, Cantinflora,Grenades/Dynamite, TNT Charge/Mines
Who can carry 1800 bullets, also i showed you soldiers carried between 80-120 pounds.
“alleged claims”
quoted one of the best sources for small arms data about ww2 weapons
quoted book written about mg34 and mg42
also this is from US army (quoted in last book)
they did say “a high degree of skill and training are required to obtain the best results” which might be the case
i guess a german version might be better
yes as the mg42 was only an infantry weapon
the mg42 was never used as a fixed aa gun
the mg42 was never used on vehicles
the mg42 was never used as a fixed gun
the mg42 was only ever hip/shoulder fired
that being said of course 900-1500 bpm is of course for the mythical infantry gun as is the 50-250 round magazine.
that training is about controlling recoil and firing in short bursts, not about raw weapon performance. effective rate of fire between mg34 and mg42 is basically the same(~150rpm), while raw rof for mg42 is 1200.
