So what? There are other super fast shooting weapons already in the game, so whats even the point? MG42 needs to make “brrrrt” every time I tap left mouse button, otherwise its simply not the real deal!
note afther post closed: you guys realize that there are still existing original MG42s right? Check out youtube, look for MG3 (900rpm) and then compare it with MG42 - you will hear the difference."
Will it be super crazy faster? (1500 rpm)
Or will it be a noticable amount faster? (1200 rpm)
I dont know why this discussion had to escalate the way it did, but on my part I though 1200 rpm was public knowledge.
They are afraid of the weapon, my friend, he can perfectly carry a cadence of 1500 and his belt of 250But you come up with the excuse you mentioned. "It’s not necessary,"You waste a lot of ammo,“It will bring imbalance to the game”"990 is enough"And other more silly and empty excuses without weight to prevent the Cadence that corresponds to it
This is the MG45 Premium’s Fire Rate which is 1650There are 150 more But still it does not stray far from what it really should have
Don’t Pay Attention to the Allied/Soviet Crybabies
If I knew back then that these clowns will complain about MG42’s rof instead of reload speed (which is the longest out of all MGs) then I would have asked for 100 round MG34 instead.
I mean, if this is your argument, then trust me, the sound difference between 900 and 1200 is so negligible that you won’t notice it.
As for why I don’t want it to have that, it’s because I’m thoroughly against having weapons just always being straight upgrades to each other, especially at high BR. If that were the case and it got 1200rpm, why ever touch the MG15 or MG45 again?
I find it to be boring, lazy, and making things less interesting. Give us choices, and reasons to play with different things and use different equipment. Especially at high BR, when everything is so stupidly chaotic and everyone’s just using whatever the new best thing is.
Even still, with 100 rounds, the power of this thing will be insane even with 900rpm
You don’t even know what you’re saying. There’s a big difference between 990 and 1060. With the Early MG42, as well as the 1320 of the MG15,39 And you can also see the change with the MG45’s 1650 Cadence where I even shared a videoI also remind you that the MG42 has a Rate of Fire of 1500 where The MG45’s rate of fire should also be fixed to 1800 as it should be.Plus his 250 belt
Each Faction will use the best they have for Tier V so when the Major Update comes From this month the allies will use the Super Pershing, Hyde M1944 and the Ofenrohr We want the same in Germany with the MG42, which is far below its capacity.
I am waiting for the report/documents of where the fictitious weapons like the AS-44, T20, Hyde M1944 were fought, which I did not see. To be used in such war Unlike the MG42, which I have already mentioned many times, as they operated on foot with that camera.Of bullets even if it was not rec And I’m not making things up like the Allies/Soviets did so that their experimental weapons could be used. According to them, they are fine to be in the For “Balance”
I’ve said repeatedly that the weapons in Enlisted should have the same ROF that the “Average” weapon used in WW2 had. Not the ROF that a couple of experimental models had, but the most common ones actually used in WW2. If DF tried to be historically accurate with the ROF the actual weapon used then people wouldn’t have anything to complain about because the only people they could be pissed at would be the actual gun manufacturer.
Ima put this in words that would definitely help support this but the fire rate is not the main concern for me as no matter what there’s gonna be differences in guns like the Fed having high damage or the Type hei having 30 rounds but the mg42 having a high fire rate surpassing 1000 I’m okay with since it’s honestly already fast as hell like what ima matrix a weapon shooting 990 rounds a minute like I’m not neo but I believe yes they should give the MG45/34/39/42E all 100 rounds as yea the 50 rounds is useless as you would be spending more time reloading then actually shooting
The actual main problem is that certain people ask for more rounds for the MG42 like if that happens let’s say it gets 200 rounds in the TT what’s the point in using infantry squads or assaulters or snipers (I hope it happens to snipers) like what’s the point in using AA or buildable machine gun nests I mean what’s the point in using the machine guns on D-DAY when you can be a walking with one like what’s the point in using anything except AT squads and machine gunners
Neither do you. You responded to a post that wasn’t addressed to you (conveniently ignoring the one that does) and then proved to me you have no idea what you’re talking about.
I’ll ask again. Cite your sources.
The argument was about sound report, so no there’s not a difference that a person could discern.
You can’t talk about balance changes like this if you actually think higher rpm = more powerful weapon.
No. You’re just plain wrong. That rpm is only possible with a special lightweight anti air bolt that WAS NOT issued to regular infantry. If you think otherwise, cite your sources.
No. The few prototypes had a variable cyclic rate between 1350 and 1800, not fixed at 1800. If you think otherwise, cite your sources.
250 round belts were not carried by individual soldiers, only those firing from fixed positions.
You clearly have very limited firearm knowledge despite trying to sound like you do, or you’d understand how unbelievably heavy that amount of ammunition is
Were you reading the post? I never said that was not the case. I said that shouldn’t be the case and don’t make it worse but artificially adjusting things.
The MG42 is not below its capacity.
Completely irrelevant to your argument.
Oh, the pictures you posted showing soldiers carrying 50 to 100 round belts?
