The unbalanced allies

[TovarishToNy]

Got Gaijined there with the booster curse with conquest + shit team.

[CombatBoilerman]

"Because the US troops in Normandy had inadequate weapons compared to the German army. Of course, the weapons of the US troops were good, but this is relative. We need to understand why high-ranked players are on the German side. The reason is that weapons such as the STG44, 75-round MG, and FG are far superior to the US weapons. If the US troops had at least good infantry equipment, there would be no reason for the Axis to win easily like they are now. axis in normandy is like Allies in moscow

Of course, you can win, but you have to do everything yourself. In the process,players get angry and tired, and they may even lose interest in the game and the developers wouldn’t even bother to make changes (sometimes even being lazy). And now, what has become of it? With their thoughtless balance sense and incomprehensible updates, they have driven away their own users.

Then they offered a massive overhaul that gives hope . I’m looking forward to it. I hope that the game where one side is unilaterally slaughtered will be fixed. I just hope that they make wise decisions.

[SilentHaven]

If you read the dev and update blogs, you might be happy. Your issue should stop being an issue then.

Let’s Discuss the Meta Changes

Greetings, commanders. In the last few days our community has been actively discussing huge changes that are coming to Enlisted. We’re keeping an eye out for your feedback that’s been both and . It’s really great that you care about our game, and if you criticize our plans, you clearly do it because you wish it well. In this thread I’d like to, let’s say, reset our discussion, and so I’d like you to pay attention to a simple request of mine. I’d like to ask you “why?” Why do you …

[YouniquE]

Playerbase shifts campaigns more than you change your daily socks. Can’t predict or even say that X or Y side is unbalanced. It’s all about what the good players want to grind for the day.

[GuardianReaper0]

@Covrigelul

,i will just stick with axis from now

From my experience the past couple nights, Axis is just as bad or WORSE! Teammates not setting up any rallies, all shifting to the sides of the objective and very few on it. My buddies and I are the ONLY ones keeping the team afloat. We always take top 3 or even 4. Even my buddy that sits back with a sniper and spotting for us has more kills than majority of the others. I take the time to set up fortifications one objective back and still have 2-3 times as many kills and objective interactions as the #4 on the team.

[ZebulonBVance]

I’ve been around for a while but hadn’t played since they released the player rank stuff. I’m just a corporal

[Man_bear_pig]

That theoretically solves lower-tier balance, but what are high-tier US troops supposed to use? They have nothing but the 1919 and M2 which still isn’t pleasant to use with the sights.

[GuardianReaper0]

I’m sure this isn’t what a lot of people want to hear, but the Allies have a pretty solid second sniper rifle. In many situations its been because of these that we get pushed back as Axis. The snipers can provide extremely useful support against infantry that are a threat before they even reach the front line. This helps open the door for 1919 and M2. The only thing is that it generally requires teamwork to be fully effective strategy.