Op fg42 
1 Like
You lack of reading capabilities. I stated I couldn’t remember and already stated that have campaigns maxed out as I play daily in them. And was as a question
If you can’t read a sentence , not my fault.
Have more salt. Cope more about your lack of 5 bullets.
Untill then you should consider your choises on axis side. Having 30 % win rate with op fg42 its a shame. Isn’t it?
1 Like
Well, who is the guy that is so salty about any German’s enemy?
1 Like
Or just because you only play at the time when americans are sleeping or wokring? Even in Normandy allies has a higher playerbase
30% winrate?
It’s just full of DC’s matches.
I am testing whether DC will effect the statistic or not. and later dev fixed it. So I didnt say my DC matches.
You told me another excuse back then. Lmao
Your stats:
First you state you go afk for tasks only
Now you state you are disconnecting
Both cases you forgot to see that you actually have 4000 more kills as axis than allies.
OP fg42 isn’t saving you?
Ahah
Also:
In case you don’t understand not remembering a weapon ammo as lack of gameplay on a campaign
3 Likes
No, they shouldn’t be nerfed. They should be class restricted in a historical way:
- M2 Carbine - it is an assault rifle, so should be locked for assaulters,
- FG 42 (both campaigns and both variants) - it is a paratrooper specific gun, so why not make paratrooper squads and lock FG 42 to those squads? I’ve proposed it already: Some suggestions to balance the Invasion of Normandy.
- AVS-36 and AVT-40 - now these were meant to be standard issue infantry rifles, so the solution requires some mental gymnastics - both of those guns weren’t exactly mass produced, so here probably the only option is to limit the amount of those rifles per squad to one, maybe two for a trooper squad.
1 Like
Wow, trying to misstate my words?
I use Axis for tasks:
- Do not include whether or not I will DC if its wrong mission.
- That statement is NOT for event.
And, how come a player plays Soviet but not using its tank?
Also if you go full premium squads for fast level ups.
How can you know about basic weapon’s balance? You dont even use them (often)
No, I did read it right. Having more 4000 kills more as a disconnecter right?
Strong stats.
Lmao on event you had 9% win rate. I can show you if you forgot xD
Is1 tank squad. Just got it.
This Pic is almost 2 weeks old. I had to search it in a discord room.
And 4 premium squads on a 10 slot.
Keep your delusions over balance when you clearly did play more on axis side with all the better gear you so carefully state over and over comparing to soviet side but yet, you show us a 30% win rate with 4000 more kills than on soviet side.
Skill issue.
1 Like
The only thing that matter is not the weapon. It’s player base!
If you have 100 player:
30 play axis
70 play allied.
The ratio reflect the attractivity of each faction minus a factor due to present meta.
After few days it will become:
20 axis
80allied
And the attractivity become 80% for allied.
Put a Tiger, it will go down to 60%.
Nerf the FG42 it will go up to 65%.
At the end if the player base is 100 or 100 000 the attractivity will affect the number of bots and pro player in each campaign. Not the weapon.
At the end if you don’t want to wait for a game or play with bot you don’t care about balance you care about attractivity.
Who care balance in an assymetrical game. I care about fucking bots and general lvl of player.
“There is no problem a Tiger can not solve. If the problem persist put more Tiger”.Now you understand why I said that a long time ago.
4 Likes
I have suggested dynamic balance long time ago…
But dev just insist on fixed balance settings.
1 Like
When they say “we have enough stat to balance the game” I think that exactly what they means.
They then adjust the time to capture and ticket to modifie the win rate.
The win rate then modify the attractivity (you want to win at the end…)
No it wont. Add the STG
Could you please show me the stats of the Berlin campaign?
Don’t worry I think avt ammo should be rolled back again
1 Like
The goal is to have a playerbase of 50% to be balanced in a gameplay perspective.
The x in the attractivity, it depend on weapon op/cheat, number of bots, good experience, win rate.
To low, and the player base will drop. To high and the player base drop too because of the bots.
The meta is the point where the nerf/up should be made before it drop on the right side.
Germany Berlin is on the left side, with lesd than 30% of attractivity.
So don’t fucking nerf it!
Put more tiger, make it attractive!
2 Likes
I’ve stop to go to different campaign because I though Berlin allied and Normandy Axis are over on the right of the Meta point… winning everytime is boring.
At least for me.
The campaign die if the playerbase go to 0.
Aren’t there more axis players in Berlin than in Moscow these days?
Because Berlin’s axis has fg42ii and 75 mg
So, just looking at the weapon, I think berlin is more attractive than moscow.
Even mg34 opens at level 9
or did they all go to Normandy?
XD
In my opinion It just takes time to find a balance.
The Tiger increase the attractivity to force the player base to go up, “fighting against the curve.”
If nothing was done it would keep falling.
My stats’d better reset now.
Full of AFK matches for BP tasks.
And lots of DC matches for bad connection, and for wiki.
This is purely my experience but Between 3pm and 9pm GMT time, the quality of AXIS PLAYER is very high This time. Conversely, the quality of ALLIES decreases. This is the first game I’ve seen like this. It’s an amazing experience to see the win rate of a team change over time.
1 Like