Whoever developed the Seagull and decided to put it in, in its current state-needs to be fired. It doesn’t fly, it looks like crap, and oh by the WAY-it doesn’t take off from the water oh unless you turn quick and then it kills you-wtf guys?
1 Like
It’s weird we didn’t get the Kingfisher. I don’t remember the seagull ever being in war thunder (or the Japanese floatplane while we’re at it), so it’s an odd choice.
Kingfisher would be more comparable all around. Faster (but still not as fast as the Japanese float) and with a heavier payload
Really saying that the Kingfisher is faster and better armed than something added to an American tree is a sad statement. It was removed from progression in war thunder for being too bad.
3 Likes
Same way we should got F2A-1 instead of F2A-3 or A6M2-N as a replacement for A5M4, which is in fact useless.
1 Like
Use the flaps. Full throttle → flaps to takeoff.
They could have at least given A5M its bombs. The pylons are there, but the bombs are not. As if F2A needed any more advantages over that thing.
1 Like
both of those are modules unlocks for cruisers and BBs for naval war thunder
NGL Pacific is the first campaign where despite being level 15 or so on both sides, I haven’t even bothered putting an aircraft squad in lineup yet.