after all berlin is one of the most balanced campaign when it comes to tanks.
mainly because both sides are using late war equipment.
1 Like
I know, but hear me out.
We had endless crying about the toughness of Jumbo, weâve had endless complaints about the toughness of Panther and difficulty killing it with the tools available.
Imagine the tears if Moscow Soviets get the KV-1. Itâs not invulnerable, but unless you know where the weak spots are and have good AP, the weaknesses are gonna be hard to learn. Whatâre the new german players gonna say when that campaign opens to past-gen consoles, when they discover theyâre being asked to fight KV-1 with PzII and Dynamite?
On Berlin it wouldnât be as bad, but still bad. Balancing tanks against tanks is a thing the devs have experience with, but Gaijinâs track record on tank balance isâŠquestionable at best. Balancing a heavy tank against infantry is a whole other ball game, and they rightly should slaughter soldiers, but there has to be an infantry answer to that, and I donât see one that makes sense.
itâs actually different.
as stated above, you use late war vehicles that are ââsimilarââ ( to an averange ).
itâs not like the jumbo where itâs been fought by a puma, PZ III N and PZ IVS.
in berlin, 1 shot will most likely kill your opponent if well aimed. and there are not many differences withing the vehicles in the campaign.
like, no matter which vehicle you are using, you just have to aim for the turett. not a pixel of a mg port.
and guns are pretty much on a similar level.
again, you canât really compare it as pz II, PZ III and T38s wouldnât do much against it.
perhaps kv1s could be introduced in stalingrad campaign ( if iâll ever exist ).
good joke.
honestly.
itâs not really about tracking records ( which they still do )
nah, itâs not that bad. just pull a cooldown or a heat system like any tank and there you go.
you even have panzerfausts.
they should go through.
We mostly agree in berlin, I think translation is getting in the way.
But, I can and I did. Youâre right, those tanks will all struggle against KV-1, same way M5A1, M8, and M4 struggle against panther, and weâve all seen the kind of complaining that generates. If they add it, the KV-1 will be fighting those tanks, itâs a certainty, and it would cause problems.
This is probably fine.
Long reload times will go a long way to making it less a problem, but it wonât matter much if theyâre sitting in the grey zone behind stronger armor. Itâs not common in berlin, so I donât see it as a large problem, but a potential one.
I play soviets. I donât want to have to fight Tiger II with panzerfausts, and I donât want Axis to have to fight IS2 with them. We might have a difference of opinion here. I donât think heavy tanks should be added to this game because they cause balance problems that only get worse when they try to correct them, and I can make arguments to support my opinion, but in the end itâs an opinion. We donât have to agree.
which to be honestâŠ
the time traveling T50 is kinda the same thing over and over with the other campaignsâŠ
yeah, there are a few, but guns are usually good that can pen a cross the map so, yeah 
i mean, we past that time long ago.
doesnât really matter what we think or not.
it does not meet with the " devs " visions ( as i read multiple times ).
but for me as long it can be killed frontally from the first tank to the last, itâs a win win " situation ".
( not sniping a pixel, or being unable to deal with a panther compleately 
but thatâs for another time. )
either way, have a good one.
( perhaps i should stop to derail topic )
2 Likes
is-2 had double reload speed as tiger. but , felt like paper against KT.
atleast on alpha, atleast with my experience with it. ofc , could come with some aspects changed.
but heyâŠ
was fun as hell
is2 :
but anyway. this is more so there is an option to have the tank destroyers alongside the normal tanks with a dedicated squad.
buts its a hard thing to ask since free 2 play players cant have the choise to do so.
yeah. i edited the post befor , was my bad 
ah yesâŠ
âââgoodâ"" 'ol HEs from tanks of elder versions.
that couldnt kill no one xD
multiple rage posts about HE were made on cuisine royal discord at that time x)
1 Like
Yâall, I feel dumb.
Until watching the videos posted here, I didnât realize tank guns clip through solid objects, but the shell stops at the object. Iâve been playing tanks as if the barrel was physically modelled and would bump things in itâs way 
we learn everydayâŠ
I second this, and would like it applied to the M10 (and maybe the M8) as well. Would make it easier to justify using it in Normandy as well.
2 Likes
yeah!
absolutly like the M10 was introduced!
a squad just for the tank hunters!
Jagdtiger?
i donno about it but the panther version was shown ingame
anyway, all possible Tank hunters could have their unique squad⊠just sayingâŠ
this is funny, not gonna lie :
american tank hunters could carry bazookas incase their TD wasnât combat capable 
1 Like
even bazookas are weak arent they? :Z
idk, donât have it unlocked i have unlocked all current axis equipment for normandy but there is a video on YT that is a tank hunting training video
Iâd drive it. Maybe this is the mobile AT guns they were talking about.