well, because it was a sign to financially support this title.
is that a crime? don’t think so.
have you ever saw me going around with mp41s? no because i’m not that type of player that likes using op weapons. can’t say the same about cat. but after all, he payed for his stuff.
and we thought that they were going to stop with squads. not entire arsenal.
I don’t know. I hated prem squads since day 1
Maybe you complained about it more than me so I’ll give you a credit for that
But remember, a person who dislikes pay to win…
…Doesn’t PAY to WIN
I never bought anything else from Enlisted after I experienced how P2W they are.
Tbh the way I played in the moscow campaign (the only campaign I have premiums in) is spawning a tank, spawning premium Squad, spawning bob the builder Repeat.
I was joking off course
It’s just too ironic not to make a joke about it 
Take the personal debates elsewhere please. Here is not the place.
I think argue with a monetization of this game a bit… weird. This is a game from a Gaijin publisher. No Valve. No funny hats. If you want to speed up your grind - pay. If you want to just have some fun - dont pay. All your arguments against - a reason to play Hell let loose, Postscriptum, Day of Infamy and many, many others.
And how is communist here, i beg my pardon? 
I think the only way we can get a good system is by allowing us to vote on what will and won’t be monetized. Simple as.
So nothing will be lmao I don’t think you understand how life work. People aren’t going to pay for something they can get for free easily
exept this affect the whole community. doesn’t it?
Yeah, let’s get back on topic
Where have I left…
DEVS PLS DON’T KILL MY GAV GAME!!! 
Elite and I will watch a bit with you the discussion to keep it civil please keep in mind that we are not your enemy we just here to keep it clean for the Devs.
Getting strictly better equipment is not paying to speed up your grind.
I would be fine with just grind speedup, like premium time that only gives XP boost.
The decision, most certainly. Personal attacks and debates which are not related to the implementation of this system however… In that case, it is completely unrelated and does not belong here. So let’s not go there.
I dont see I way to get better equipment by paying. all the way players are in the same boat. But those how deside to pay get gear faster.
than how we should test things?
i don’t think can sustain preatty much it self.
because the loved main point of having fun, it’s plagued by pretty much who pays.
making the whole experience for who buy stuff shorter, and people that get owned by others that payed even more shorter.
is that what we want?
and if i’m here in enlisted and not on others games, its because me like many others expect a different title. and i don’t see why this game should be ruined just to give the whole project more money aggresively when can be obtained in many others way.
I vote on that. And maybe premiun squad as cosmetic, like for example british expeditionary fordes for battle of france 1940.
This game had a chance not to become a failure. But the community decided that it should be f2p (read p2w)
Another great project ruined by human greed
Who is communist?
Communists fought against the money so I wouldn’t call you communist because you are more of an extreme capitalist
And again, speeding up the grind is okay but buying weapons, better squads and more squad places…is just too much and you have to agree on that