For a monetization system where you can buy individual weapons is to be a thing, this has to either not allow you to upgrade guns/soldiers through it, or remove gun/soldier upgrades entirely. If this not happens, the game will become absolute pay to win and I know none of the content creators can support that, which will lead to massive negativity on content creator platforms such as Youtube or Twitch, and in return, bad PR for the game as a whole. I highly recommend reconsidering this system.
8 Likes
Wow so this is going to become the premium FPE of enlisted lmao
5 Likes
Now every time someone whats to say that the devs are bad and only care about money they gonna bring this up FUN
Yeah, another 2 months of waiting
Wasn’t OBT scheduled for the end of february?
Sometimes, people don’t realize the mistakes they are making. That’s why we (players), give our feedback in order to say what’s good and what’s not
Anyways, I want Enlisted to be good too
But we need to have more communication with the developing team in order to come up with a conclusion 
10 Likes
This isn´t as much a fiction, as a leak of actual information that maybe could have gotten to us in form of devblogs when it is too late to deflect unintentional disaster.
Still, thank you for providing some explanation.
6 Likes
that which we do not even hide can not leak. 
We-test- together with the same participants of the CBT
Could you please explain how the participants were chosen? As it seems like none of the really active members seem to have gotten access. I would like to think that said active members would be the most capable of writing good feedback and are the most likely to test this feature in-depth.
2 Likes
My 2 cents for what it’s worth is that the +1 squad and vehicle absolutely needs to go. In the hands of a bad player it’s a pretty negligible advantage, but in the hands of a skilled player, it’s completely game-changing and game-breaking. One person with 2 vehicles would easily be able to tip the scales extremely in his favor.
The XP bonus and such, personally I am open to testing it when we eventually all get access to it before I form an opinion.
2 Likes
These enough options?
I am pretty sure most people here would be fine with most if not all of these.
Unfortunately, I don’t know.
This is more technical testing.
We will certainly be interested in the identity of the players in the future.
1 Like
Yes, of course. However, the fact that only small amount of “chosen ones” got oportunity to actually test only caused distrust.
Why such a limited amount in the first place? To avoid “too much feedback”?
1 Like
Look at the end of the day I’ve got a serious case of Stockholm Syndrome when it comes to games like these. If all the monetization gets completely reworked, I’d be fine with it. But at this level it just isn’t feasible, and will only chase people away.
2 Likes
Would it be possible for you to verify that at least the proportion of english forum users vs russian forum users is somewhat equal? From experience, the Russian players often have a different view on things like monetization than others. This is of course not a bad thing, but for the sake of the best testing, there needs to be a good variety of players.
If there is need for any testers, I personally can recommend @ErikaKalkbrenner, @627636, @73507743, @_31420124242011 and @19945606 as they all have drastically different views on the game and its progression.
4 Likes
Можете объяснить данную ситуацию что вы там, разработчики, сейчас планируете? Ведь ситуация не особо приятная из-за неправильных решений например ничего не сказать другим что ведётся такой тест? Плюс отзывы очень неприятны. Что будет дальше? Или такую информацию Вы не можете дать? Можете ответить на русском, я переведу для других.
Translation - I am asking for more information about this situation and about the decision to not inform everyone about the test.
When introduced a new feature in a Closed environment like the CBT is, it’s best to randomy pick a number of players and give them access to said new feature.
Why? Just look at this forum. Something got leaked from a test in a CBT game that’s constantly changing and people are in a panic and calling the game dead.
Honestly, in their shoes, I would do the same thing and limit the amount of people being granted access until it’s possible to confirm it’s all actually working OK and it’s stable, and then deal with adjusting it or changing it if necessary.
Guys just wait a bit the devs most likely sleep at this point they will be back by tomorrow perhaps we can get a respond by then. For now stay calm
That’s because the systems introduced look seriously draconic and player unfriendly. It’s more akin to a mobile skinnerbox game than it is a WT-esque game.
3 Likes
honestly, that sounds more like one of the most sorry exscuses.
No me. So sad. I thought we are friends :задумчивый:ухмыляясь:
I agree, but remaining polite and calm about it will go further than throwing potatoes at the wall.
1 Like