T28 / T95 (Tutel)

Cost: 8 engineer resources :smiley:

3 Likes

Lol

1 Like

Yeah, this vehicle definitely needs to be in game. Enlisted has potential to be the first game in which this vehicle could be truly fun to play.

1 Like

Yes, it also would have the lowest top speed at a disgustingly low 13 km/h. It would probably take 4 minutes just to get to the objective, and your teammates would be angry at you for taking up so much space.

For reference, the M4A3E2 Jumbo, with the slowest top speed in the USA tech tree, is 3 times faster than the T28.

Also T95 was built in the 50s from what I read.

Given this information, it should not be added to the tech tree, and not even as a premium or event vehicle.

1 Like

Why do you want to drive there with a tank in the first place?
If you want to commit suicide, just the option in the game menu.

1 Like

Fun in every map except omer, vaux, guadalcanal, georgia, ardennes and pretty much any map where you have buildings and urban combat. This thing is wide as hell and couldnt move past the spawn in most normandy maps

1 Like

Well, they could just add the version without side tracks.

1 Like

But then it would be way too good. 300mm frontal plate and bigass cannon that can ohk any tank from any distance. Kinda like ho-ri but much better.

It would be extremely vulnerable to bombs + easily demobilized by destroying it’s tracks (since it’s so slow it won’t ever be able to evade EPs.)

It would definitely still have its weakness.

Plus every tanker can always just shot its cannon to force its crew to jump out.

And if I remember correctly, it has quite big weakspot behind its tracks.

Did you forget that we were “teased” with this one tank almost 11 months ago:

When they finally decide to finish it and release, this thing should be enough for USA.

6 Likes

its also very easy to OHK it via a cupola shot, which was the main reason I was very sad the WT community voted at 3am to stop the APHE changes. I say this as a certified Turtle enjoyer.

1 Like

Yeah also this, lets get parity with the KTH first, And even then I think after that, the game doesnt need it and Id much rather seem the far more interesting lighter vehicles with an overhaul to the rider class first.

1 Like

you are thinking of the MBT t95 not the td t95

1 Like

While I would love a good infantry/tank game, please let’s not try to make this all about experimental WT vehicles when the basics aren’t; even working OK!

1 Like

Say that - Ho-Ri which didn’t even exist in reality

However, this does not prevent her from fighting with the real M26

T32E1 - perfect :ok_hand: Heavy Tank in a class weighing 65-70 tonn)
weigh - King Tiger H and peace paper - Ho-Ri
image

Or
Ops…early APFSDS-T :grin:

for allies of course - a good idea :wink:
image
image


Either have hte Ho-Ri or Japan never gets to fight BR5 because there is nothing else that can foot it with the other BR5 tanks.

So yes it is fantasy, but it fills a niche the make a faction useable.

there is no such need for T28 or Maus, nor any way to “balance” them since in WT you will note they get to face cold war vehicles

1 Like

Are you forgetting about Charges and Panzerfausts? It would be fun, and this is a game. Why not add it?

You need a reason to add them in, not a reason to not do so.

And there is no reason to add them except the vicarious titillation of fan boys.

The US, Germany, and Russia do not get access to a 7.3 equivalent vehicle like the Japanese do. Not to mention this is a game where the T95 would actually be useful in its intended role.