T-50 is still absurd and still must be nerfed

Yeah… in T-50 I often feel practicaly invincible and while it is not always one shot-kill, I have no problems destroying axis tanks en masse.

While the amount of effort I need to take when playing axis to take out a single t-50 is simply riddiculous.
Unless I can flank that thing, I do not use tank at all if I see them being active on the battlefield, because I would just feed the meatgrinder further with no real impact.

It is much easier to take them out with TNT or direct stuka on it (assuming there is one).

possible
ive just never been able to get a good attack run with it, while i am pretty effective with every other attacker ive tried

R

1 Like

And thats it only benefit over sniper svt

Just like most common soviet smg that i encounter is ppd box. most opponents are low levels no matter if playin axis or soviets.

Ofcourse we are talking weapons and not overall balance. Cause some other ‘mystical things’ also affect balance like how axis get more tickets and cap points faster…
edit: this just one patch that nerfed allies across board while buffing axis

thats how you should use it tho

No, no and no.
Game wise, it’s recoil is too large to be useful as full auto while sniping. And just bacause it can fire full auto doesn’t mean it’s locked to it. There is a switch firing mode button for a reason.
IRl wise, no. The original idea was to use the full auto, but it was found in trials that it’s near useless. It’s the reason why rifles like this never lasted long. They were impractical, as the large full sized rifle round created too much recoil when used from the shoulder in a relatively light infantry rifle.

And thats it only benefit over sniper svt

It’s main benefit is that the full auto mode allows the sniper to actually fight back properly when forced into close quarters.

Just like most common soviet smg that i encounter is ppd box

I find the drum variant more often than the box. And fact is, the avrage russian level is at least 5 levels above the axis.

Yet this was done because the axis were losing too much. And that’s precisely because of the bad weapons, especially at low tiers. As not only do the weapons cause balance issues themselvs, they turn players away. So the soviets end up with both better guns and players.
I¨m not saying stuff like this is a great solution, it’s not, but something kinda needed to happen, otherwise the situation would only get worse.

yeh il2 is better at a2a but that’s not too important in enlisted and not what you need from a ground attack craft.

nah. those rockets are trash and you have to be super accurate with 50kg if you want to kill anything. 500kg… much less so. theres also the starter stuka if you want more bombs but smaller payload, and 2x250kg just makes the 110 so much better (that one does have autocannons).

what are you smoking

not after the bomb nerf they arent

1 Like

literally just pull down on the mouse

i don’t have an problem with it, if you do it’s a skill issue.

irrelevant, not what we’re discussing

i respectfully disagree, from my experience rockets are much more effective than large bombs

of which Russian biplanes gets asw along with extra 2 mg mounted compared to the german one that gets 2 50kg bombs which is a fair trade but those extra 2 guns is def not. Already from the start the Russians gets an advantage in the air along with smgs. Ppds are really capable of taking down squads pretty fast when facing them head on in my experience

literally just pull down on the mouse

That’s kinda like answering the T50 problem with “Just shoot back turret bro”

i don’t have an problem with it, if you do it’s a skill issue.

Kinda seems like aimbot if you can keep a full auto AVS steady at 100m range.

i respectfully disagree, from my experience rockets are much more effective than large bombs

Eh. Rockets are good and allow you to keep pressure on the frontline and halt advances, but 2x250kg can decimate tanks and give you multi kill x17s. Overall though, I’d say a 250kg is worth around 6-8 rockets.

but that doesn’t matter RBS82 rockets have an insanely lower explosive payload than 250kg.

not it isn’t, one is easy to do and you can do it any time you shoot, one involves tank positioning and luck, what do you even mean

ah the old ‘if he’s better than me he must be cheating’ cope

1 Like

But the Panther is shit, so it isn’t a good comparison

1 Like

Yes, the case is completely different here.
Gold order Panther in Berlin is pretty much a savior of anyone who ever tried to play with “I explode if anything looks in my general direction IV.”
Gold order t-50 can much rather be compared to what would happen if premium jumbo was available before panther was released

3 Likes

Very funny, the Panther is the best tank in Normandy and Berlin.

Even if they added the Maus to Moscow axis would still complain about the T-50.

That is true, however, comparing panther in Normandy to panther in Berlin is false since T-34 is perfectly capable of destroying it frontally, while most US tanks simply cannot.

3 Likes

also berlin is in general much more hostile to tanks
because of all the destroyed buildings it easier to sneak up on a tank and the literally first AT weapon you get is a panzerfaust

1 Like

well they could after breaking the barrel, caausing the crew to break out

Best tank in Normandy because the Americans can’t punch at that weight level
The Soviets can however and the Panther’s shortcomings like horrible gun handling come to light

I stuck with the PzIV until the Tiger was added and am much much happier for it

I can’t argue this