what about the browning m1919a6
do you think it is really a BR V gun?
1 Like
That actually sounds cool
Only speaking on your suggestions for Japan:
It would make any new player skip BR 1 (Starter Type 38 rifle to BR2)
Folder the best TT semi auto (Type 4)
And have the Type 96 become the single best machinegun in BR 2, by far, as it is basically a Bren with no recoil.
Make the A6M2 have no place anymore, as the A6M3 is better in every way.
I would agree with lowering the BR of the slow firing type 99 rifles.
1 Like
Half of that stuff is bold and can work, the other half is ridiculous tho.
only thing i can get 100% behind in this suggestion is foldering some stuff. otherwise i dont agree with most suggestions.
2 Likes
I’d highly recommend 3 separate posts in the future for something like this, one for tanks, one for aircraft and one for small arms, maybe one more heavier weapons.
Some of the vehicle suggestions are fine/ actually good. The Stugs all going down should be a no brainer but in return the Pz 3N should receive its actual HEAT round and get a far more 20/50/25/5 load, namely APHE/HE/HEAT/Smoke and then moved to BR3. The Puma however should 100% stick at BR2. Same for the T-34 which has no right being at BR2. And the Ho-Ri Proto, next to no right at BR4. Or the P-38E going to BR1???
I also think the mobile rallies should stay at BR2, Id also like to see a mobile rally 2 added in the form of command vehicles like in the pictures below at say BR3 or BR4 with a 50% reduction in spawn in time.
German
British/Allied
Soviet
Also in no world should the M1 Bazooka be a BR1 weapon. I disagree with the sturmpistol too but due to the M1 being mentioned it seems small in comparison. Someone else has pointed out the madness of semi’s going down too.
TLDR, let this one go back into the oven.
2 Likes
TJLockie you have way too much time on your hands, I looked like this after reading your post 
. I am now off to try out every weapon to see if I agree with you 
1 Like
A6M3 is a premium/event plane though, it’s not too different to the regular zero, only slightly better. Definitely doesn’t deserve to be against BR 4 & 5 vehicles. The reason I swapped the type 38 to BR 2 is because it is hands down the best bolt action but it’s at BR 1. So I swapped it with the type 99 late. Type 96 sees no use in BR 3 anymore due to the KE7 and the type 99 being superior in every way.
1 Like
Care to elaborate?
I’m talking about the P38E fighter that is currently at BR 3 with no M8 rockets. It’s ridiculous that it is that high when other variants with the rockets are the same BR. I would have said BR 2 but there’s a pre merge fighter variant at BR 2 with the M8 rockets. It has no place being that high and with only one 20mm and looking at vehicles like the IAR for Germany, the E variant belongs at BR 1.
Puma is a great tank but unfortunately the trade off is no armour for better mobility so it becomes squishy. Most maps don’t really cater for it to have its full potential so that’s why I put it in BR 1.
T34 short barrel at BR 2 because Russia has the weakest BR 2 tanks right now and no variety in comparison to Germany. The T34 has 4 crew and an awful commanders view port so i believe it would be best suited for BR 2.
HO-RI proto, again not as good at the TT HO-RI and a premium vehicle with no coax MG and easy to destroy even with molotovs. I wouldn’t care if it went to BR 4, I would compare it to the Dicker Max but that is it BR 3.
Giving BR 1 some form of AT capability outside of the awful AT rifles would ensure that they can compete with BR 2 tanks. Giving them mobile rallies early on makes them contribute to the team more and gives more flavour to BR 1 lineups.
And again, as i said before to the butthurt guy above, I brought down the BR 4 semi autos only because in my ideal Enlisted, BR 3 would only face BR 4 and BR 2. The Current BR 4 semi autos aren’t even that much better than the BR 3 semi autos. And if Russia gets the SVT 38, to balance out the reload speed, the gewehr 43 and Johnson need to be brought down.
What don’t you agree with?
I think it should remain a BR 5 weapon because of its high capacity magazine, I would like to see the M1919 variant (with no stock or muzzle attachment) with maybe a 50 round belt at BR 3.
1 Like
ye
is the only excuse
that rate of fire is trashy for an mg
Hence why I moved the Bren 100 down to BR 4 but that is also a gold order weapon so it’s uncommon.
1 Like
The Japanese air tech tree needs desperately to be expanded, and in that world the A6M3 would be BR2, it just feels like a shame to sideline the A6M2 before that happens though.
The Type 96 is weird in that I feel like its too strong for BR2 but has a hard time competing with the other Tier III MGs, I could see it working in BR2, but it would need some adjustment to not feel too opressive
2 Likes
type 96 would br far too strong for BR2 simply due to it’s best in class accuracy
1 Like
Agreed, Japanese airpower is severely lacking and needs a lot more vehicles
1 Like
Ah that P-38E, the P-38 that time forgot. yeah idk what that is BR3, should be BR2 at least as a constellation prize.
The Puma’s mobility alone, validates it at BR2, even if it doesnt work on to its every advantage every single map, it works amazingly on a lot of them.
The T-28E is a monster of a tank at BR2, what are you on about, the only reason it isnt king is because how cracked the Pz3 N is as well. The Pz 3N should receive its late war HEAT round along with the ammo rebalance I mentioned and more to BR3, allowing the Pz 4 E and the Stug 3’s to fill in a nice new role in BR2 instead of being completely forgotten.
Moving the T-34 down is a horrid idea, how on earth is a Pz 2 or even most of the early german tanks meant to deal with that??? Let alone the actual criminal prospect of a later Manchuria campaign letting Japanese BR1 tank fight it???
The Ho-Ri “proto” is still BR5 material even if its overshadowed by its other BRV counterpart. Just like how the Tiger E and Jumbo 76 sit in a similar hole.
The Allied AT rifles are honestly kinda great, I think its almost a shame how fast they are phased out, Ive used the PzB-39 to kill a KV-1 before, they are perfect BR1 weapons, it lets new BR1 players enjoy tanks without being instantly mogged by the AT chads. I think the only AT weapon that needs to maybe be talked about is the PTRS 41 which borders on being a fun killer at BR1 but completely overshadowed by the M1 Bazooka at BR2. Saying that I still bring the PTRS 41 at BR2 purely because its kinda broken at shooting down aircraft.
As for the semis, your looking at a version of enlisted with both dont have and are unlikely to get. Like I agree the Johnson is a meh jump in ability vs the garand, but the G43 is absolutely a step up from the BR3 weapons. The SVT-38 is more the issue here rather than everything else, I think there should be a discussion about nerfing the SVT-38s accuracy and dispersion maybe?
2 Likes
I’m gonna have to disagree with most of your points man.
I still think that P-38E should be BR 1 purely because it has no ordinance and all the other P-38 variants overshadow it including the pre merge BR 2 fighter variant that has rockets.
While the Puma has very good mobility, the maps and grey zone restrictions really limit its full potential. That and the fact that it can be penetrated by literally anything is why I would put it at BR 1.
T-28E is decent but it is a glass cannon that can be penetrated by most German tanks. The Russians lack a brawling tank that is on par with the Panzer 3M and the T-34 is the answer to that problem. The T-34 pre merge in Moscow could still be penetrated by the short barrel 75mm that alongside its 4 crew and poor commander vision, I believe it would fit right in as the last unlock for BR 2.
I only put the HO-RI proto in BR 4 because of all its drawbacks like having no MG, poor mobility and less armour than the TT version. Also because it is locked behind a paywall at a ridiculous price so it would be rare to see too. I believe if someone is going to pay that much then they should get to have a good vehicle if they get in a downtier game against BR 3 players.
I disagree with your opinion on AT rifles, i think they are fun but unreliable and random sometimes. Even when targeting weak spots they still struggle to penetrate. You need to be way closer for them to work but why bother getting that close if you can just throw an explosive pack. If they were more consistent and had better penetration then i would agree with you but giving BR 1 players more options to take out tanks that can dominate them is a good thing.
I agree that the SVT 38 is the issue and that’s why I chose to bring other semi autos down but I do believe that it wouldn’t make much of an impact if they were moved. But you’re right, if the SVT 38 was loaded with stripper clips like the G41 it would be a lot more balanced.
P-38E could move to BR1, but more suggestion BR2 as the constellation prize since lord knows it needs anything right about now. But if you moved the E down and the G up that could work too, Im just sick of seeing 38G’s at BR2.
The Crusader is just like that Puma in that, Good gun, Good manoeuvrability, non existent armour. Both are still BR2 tanks.
T-28E is absolutely a brawler, it can bounce any of the short barrelled guns at range it might face, its immune to AT rifles mostly, its got extremely good reaction time and can tank a couple of shots unless its ammo is hit ofc. As for the Pz 3N, see my point above. The T-34 has no right facing BR1 vehicles.
Ho-Ri proto is still a BRV tank, dont make P2W mechanics out of nothing, thats just dumb.
AT Rifles are very consistent, especially if your on the side, its all about knowing how to use them, on the side hit the engine, then hit the gunner/ammo and then the driver. From the front hit the tracks, then the turret ring, then pick off the crew. Though they do need to buff the damage of AT rifles vs tracks, it shouldnt take two shots to knock off a track, especially with the single shot AT rifles.
Yeah as I said, the SVT 38 is the issue, by moving all the other semis around youll only make more problems. Nerf the SVT 38 appropriately, or you could say that a squad at BR 3 with it didnt get the spare magazines and have to use the stripper clips (which could and would happen) while if you use the SVT-38 in a BR4 match, you get your spare magazines.