I understand the soviet Panzerfaust was not designed or built by Soviets therefore should be replaced by a Soviet weapon but why remove the German Panzerschreck when is was produced by Germans and actually extensively used in combat, I understand the design was based on the American bazooka but it was actually 88mm caliber when the bazooka was 60mm.
I donāt understand I was talking about hurricane and P38 what are you talking about ?
Can you remember me what was the us tactic to arbore while they were versus a tiger I or II tank ?
It the same with the hellcat everyone hate it because no one use it as a flanker I know greyzone limit a lots but you can always do someting
Today was in Chi-nu vs an M26 and god damm canāt pierce it in front what should i do ? got him in the flank nothing hard
Yes it does since Soviets can have amazing semi auto with fast reloading time, Americans can have amazing semi autos with fast reloading time and that on top of amazing smgs and great tanks. There are no point in playing as BR2-3 Axis since everything in a TT that they have outside of tanks are total underpowered crap.
Why continuing this wreck if it all comes back to you desperately trying to find something that is on the same level as Panzerfaust vs. PTRD (and wont find anyways)
Now real life?
Real life didnt had magical greyzones and US didnt face that many Tiger, especially IIs, to begin with.
Nice that you already did my job to explain why this doesnt work.
Or why lights in general suck in this game.
russian have some AT weapon too less produced because of the panzerfaust capture , they have dog too even if the working is desirable. lots of ppl spam ptrs on track then demo or tnt. iām not saying it is a viable answer !
if i can flank Jumbo in my Pz IV why you canāt in a more mobile sherman vs tiger II as if the guys were looking always at you, if it turn the turret shoot it, go on the side of the map idk man. I donāt why usa donāt have laser gun since they want pen everything in the front.
I donāt know if i can talk about the russian T34 vs Pz 3 wich is a pain in the ass and frontally is suicide
not even HO-I versus M4 105 ?
Light donāt have the same role as IRL thatās why they arenāt that high br is just for the beginning
Shall we talk about japan too with their 100 mm pen lancher without sight ? the emperor guiding the shot or something ?
Panzerfaust shouldnāt be as OP as it is you chould carry only one ! one german squad carry more faust than some tank carry ammo
That didnt work, would be a pain in the ass to develop and probably end as killfeed for Axis.
You mean the one out of 10 kills that probably were not even in greyzone to begin with?
Why only using a Panzer IV if Puma is better for āflankingā?
Why should he not? Most of the time CPs and other hot areas are in vicinity to each other so you dont need to move your turret for 90Ā° degree.
Because they assume that most Germans dont play like dumbasses I guess.
I dont know if this is sarcasm or another case of shooting yourself in the leg.
I mean just wait until they move their turret I guess.
So thanks for again proofing how meaningless āflankingā is in the game because otherwise fast(er) tanks would have high(er) BR.
Get the super rifle grenade with 220mm pen. Its dope and cool.
looking for realistic weapon when Usa has T20 and russian AS-44 is a joke right ?
the dog was a joke due to most of the time the poor dog came under russian tank
maybe because I was BR III and puma is BR II ?
you donāt need him to move to 90 to kill him
just stating a fact that what USA is facing other country have it tooand at a lesser BR wich is more frustrating because less player know what to do but it seems less important for some. And i donāt even know how those tanks weāre killed since flanking is āuselessā if weāre following your logic.
I dont know. The creator of this thread called captured weapon unrealistic so definition is really weird anyways.
Is there a law saying you cant take BR2 stuff to higher matches?
Except yes. It has to be about thaz degree, especially at longer distances.
It is. Even you struggle to find a clear answer here.
And I also remember that flanking or 90Ā° T-34s with the Panzer III was so easy most people just didnt play Moscow Axis because it made too much fun and was too easy it was boring.
Or the Jumbo back in Normandy times with no Panther or Panuerfaust. People couldnt stop expressing hoe much fun it was playing against the Jumbo.
I see Japan is high priority for you because it was even in a thread you likedā¦
japan is not my priority at all iām not main japan. just like every other player who play all of the nation japan is the one who lacks the most of things.
Being a suggestion and being added is clearly different
canāt you do the same versus KT so ? didnāt know flanking t34 and jumbo was so easy and too much fun that is was boring lol ? he must be funny for lots of ppl struggling to kill KT so nah ? because as you said what was happening vs jumbo is the same vs KT but maybe since itās not the allied camp they canāt have that ?
Well, it depends on what you count as a starter tank, I guess (which, in my opinion, would be the T-60 and the Panzer II C). And you missed the Crusader, which would be decent on a mere technical manner, given its speed and cannon.
And honestly, do you need more lights if the Puma and the M18 should be enough? If more is automatically better, Axis would have the best TT only based on the inflation of stuff there.