Yeah sure pal
russian have some AT weapon too less produced because of the panzerfaust capture , they have dog too even if the working is desirable. lots of ppl spam ptrs on track then demo or tnt. i’m not saying it is a viable answer !
if i can flank Jumbo in my Pz IV why you can’t in a more mobile sherman vs tiger II as if the guys were looking always at you, if it turn the turret shoot it, go on the side of the map idk man. I don’t why usa don’t have laser gun since they want pen everything in the front.
I don’t know if i can talk about the russian T34 vs Pz 3 wich is a pain in the ass and frontally is suicide
not even HO-I versus M4 105 ?
Light don’t have the same role as IRL that’s why they aren’t that high br is just for the beginning
Shall we talk about japan too with their 100 mm pen lancher without sight ? the emperor guiding the shot or something ?
Panzerfaust shouldn’t be as OP as it is you chould carry only one ! one german squad carry more faust than some tank carry ammo 
And how realistic is a proto RPG again?
That didnt work, would be a pain in the ass to develop and probably end as killfeed for Axis.
You mean the one out of 10 kills that probably were not even in greyzone to begin with?
Why only using a Panzer IV if Puma is better for “flanking”?
Why should he not? Most of the time CPs and other hot areas are in vicinity to each other so you dont need to move your turret for 90° degree.
Because they assume that most Germans dont play like dumbasses I guess.
I dont know if this is sarcasm or another case of shooting yourself in the leg.
I mean just wait until they move their turret I guess.
So thanks for again proofing how meaningless “flanking” is in the game because otherwise fast(er) tanks would have high(er) BR.
Get the super rifle grenade with 220mm pen. Its dope and cool.
looking for realistic weapon when Usa has T20 and russian AS-44 is a joke right ?
the dog was a joke due to most of the time the poor dog came under russian tank
maybe because I was BR III and puma is BR II ?
you don’t need him to move to 90 to kill him
just stating a fact that what USA is facing other country have it tooand at a lesser BR wich is more frustrating because less player know what to do but it seems less important for some. And i don’t even know how those tanks we’re killed since flanking is “useless” if we’re following your logic.
a magic 220 mm rifle wich is actually where ?
I dont know. The creator of this thread called captured weapon unrealistic so definition is really weird anyways.
Is there a law saying you cant take BR2 stuff to higher matches?
Except yes. It has to be about thaz degree, especially at longer distances.
It is. Even you struggle to find a clear answer here.
And I also remember that flanking or 90° T-34s with the Panzer III was so easy most people just didnt play Moscow Axis because it made too much fun and was too easy it was boring.
Or the Jumbo back in Normandy times with no Panther or Panuerfaust. People couldnt stop expressing hoe much fun it was playing against the Jumbo.
I see Japan is high priority for you because it was even in a thread you liked…
And you already forgot it.
1 Like
japan is not my priority at all i’m not main japan. just like every other player who play all of the nation japan is the one who lacks the most of things.
Being a suggestion and being added is clearly different
can’t you do the same versus KT so ? didn’t know flanking t34 and jumbo was so easy and too much fun that is was boring lol ? he must be funny for lots of ppl struggling to kill KT so nah ? because as you said what was happening vs jumbo is the same vs KT but maybe since it’s not the allied camp they can’t have that ?
that’s part was humoristic …
1 Like
I guess you didnt detect the sarcasm.
Yeah… not really…
Well it is the only option for Japan from the looks of it.
It would be a nice add and they could finally get some descent AT. But does DF follow this logic ? it’s something other
1 Like
as i’m not that good in english i’m trying already my best to understand and writing something wich as sense firstly ^^ sorry for that
we don’t have a lots of lights too usa have m24 , urss t-50 while puma for germany i’m not talking about the starter one
Yeah. Hoping for the best. Fingers crossed. 
1 Like
Hope too, it would be like the Granatbuchse ? hope the sights isn’t as horrific as their first launcher
1 Like
Oh. My bad then…
Well, it depends on what you count as a starter tank, I guess (which, in my opinion, would be the T-60 and the Panzer II C). And you missed the Crusader, which would be decent on a mere technical manner, given its speed and cannon.
And honestly, do you need more lights if the Puma and the M18 should be enough? If more is automatically better, Axis would have the best TT only based on the inflation of stuff there.
1 Like
It can also be like the Solothurn which can’t be used unless it is mounted. That would be quite interesting. However, I am not exactly familiar as to how these heavy shaped grenade charges work.
1 Like
I would be an very nice add but they have lots of work to do before being added so since it seems we don’t have much info. I’m sadly afraid that since japan visited and buy out some german weapon they get another Rpzb copy …
1 Like
oh yeah forgot this good one even if i’m not mistaken the ap round is pretty troll ?
don’t know what other light tank could be add other one like luchs or covenanter aren’t as good as we could use maybe some hungarian or frankenstein romanian tank
We we’re talking about some alias to the panzerfaust for the russian they got some launcher like the BRPG-44 wich launch an RPG-6 AT grenades
The LPG-44 wich launch a 70 mm grenade
and the RPG-1 wich started in the start of 45’s with a penetration of 150 and adopted in 46
So we can easily replace the panzerfaust and we shouldn’t deviate to much in history even if they are sadly prototype for some. But since we have fedorov, T20 and other … why not
Thank you for this post. I agree.
It is especially annoying when weapons that belong to certain factions arent in that tech tree eg Lewis gun for Allies, Mathilda and Valentine tank also for Allies.
There are also various interesting proper weapons that are excluded from the game, while DF claims it needs to include all these BS prototype stuff.
I understand adding factions, sub factions and so forth is a big ask but the Commonwealth countries (eg South African Reider automatic SMLEs), France, Czechoslovakia, Switzerland, the BENELUX countries, even Spain or Portugal, Id rather get real weapons from those then ultra late war prototypes, drawing board concepts, postwar stuff or copy pastes between trees “cause captured” or “cause lend lease”.
Note When I say Spain Portugal for example, I dont mean add those as factions, subfactions or even squads. Just like instead of giving Axis Soviet tech or BS prototypes, maybe theres a weapon or two from those countries that could fill that gap? (there was a Spanish legion that fought with the Wehrmacht)
1 Like
with a rate of fire of 600 rpm ?
Which one is this?
let me laugh 
I’m just sure that no one will play on M9 or T24 or M4 Sherman
The US 82nd Airborne Division captured Panzefäuste in the invasion of Sicily, and they like them so much they even deployed with them in Operation Market Garden. They later captured an ammunition dump near Nijmegen full of them, and continued to use them to the end of the war.
By the start of 1945, the Red Army began capturing so many Panzerfäuste that in February 1945 Georgy Zhukov actually issued an official directive that recommended their use.
These weren’t just things that were captured occasionally and used incidentally, they were captured in the thousands (more like in the hundreds of thousands for the Soviets) and used by units until the end of the war. For the Panzerfäust, it is more than realistic for the Allies and the Soviets to be able to use them.
As for other captured weapons, the Allies never actually used the RPzB 43, but the Soviets did. So while it would make some sense if the Soviets got them, it makes absolutely no sense that the Allies get them instead of just getting Panzerfäuste.