At first, what you want to suggest is encouraging to me, even if the two numbers are not exactly the same. However, you can currently choose from two options in each campaign. And there is no fregemntation in the factions within the campaigns. Throws anyone who starts a battle. I think we agree that based on what we know about the new system, this number will be more fragmented. Where the problem I mentioned also occurs. Do you think this number will be so balanced per BR? Or do some people think that they might (if they could) skip the part where they have a 32-round Mp35, and the opponent has a 71-round PPD? Even now, you have to use a magnifying glass to look for Axis players in Tunisia ( Recent EU server experience ), while I think there are too many of them in Normandy ( in general ). Of course, the average is there, but the reality is different. This can also happen in the new system, but not per campaign, but as a BR. I hope Iâm wrong and everything will be wonderful, It turns out.
As for the âjoin anyâ topic, I am also pessimistic (What a surprise). I guess you also saw that for some reason, someone submitted this function. And the community was not very enthusiastic about the amount of reward (1.2x if I remember correctly). In addition, others also feared that this system would rather throw them to a side where the MM did not find enough players in the first place (for which there could be countless reasons) or where they quit because the given team was crushed in 4.5 milliseconds and lost the first cap point. None of these are signs of a positive gaming experience, especially the latter.
Weâll see. I donât want to spoil anything good. If someone thinks that the new system is perfect, functional, sustainable, and the solution to all problems, then I donât want to be the person who tells them that Santa doesnât exist.
Anyway, itâs not entirely clear to me how this number comes out. 250 thousand battles with 10-10 people, potentially 5 million âplayersâ. You mention about 3. I think the difference comes from the fact that these 250,000 battles are played by the same people over and over again. If so, what is the actual number of active players?
I pray that it will be so.
Well, Operation Unthinkable was continuing East into the Soviets. Patton also fervently believed they should have kept pushing East. Considering we are already pretty thoroughly into âwhat ifâ territory with existing campaigns I wouldnât mind seeing it come in down the line. I just think we should get low-tier Soviets vs Japan first.
Operation Unthinkable could be a cool event, but I canât really see it as a campaign.
Maybe though.
Maybe they should do an event first to test the waters, but if top tier BR Soviets and top tier BR Allies can both âââfairlyâ"" play with top tier BR Germany, then they should be able to match with each other competitively.
They could, but we all know how that would go
Yeah, I know.
this is not unique players, but data from people who play battles multiple times. player difference you see is what you get from excluding bots from current battle.
and most of the answers you want is here:
this topic should die here