I agree we dont need other ww2 campaign, 6 campaign are more than sufficient for cover all the ww2 simply renaiming them in [battle for mediterran] for example and add all the north africa conflict and the invasion of sicily
But
I can already see ww2 butthurt wo start complain endlessy that they dont want korea or vietnam because tHeY WaNt PlAy ww2
I’d even be fine playing as a Napoleonian era lieutenant, and start talking like a sir.
Only if I can wear a glorious waxed mustache.
I suggest you to play holdfast for this
Spanish Civil War would be cool though. But Spanish cubism is too offending.
Would they not use many German equipment? (Government faction at least).
The tools would be meh. It’s mostly the maps I’d love to see. Incredible landscape for those battles.
A bit of everything. Kinda like China vs Japan but less minefield for Chinese cinema ehm Enlisted money.
Dont worry spanish dont was cubism instead was cubismo a lot different
Republican a lot of french and soviet
Nazionalist a lot of italian and german
And dont forget both soviet and german-italy expeditionary forces was deployed in the civil war
Others have already pointed out that it is not a good idea for a new campaign, at least, not until the technological progression is reworked.
But, if the campaign MUST be made and we at least can influence what it is…
Khalkin Gol of 1939, or go home.
1945 is going to be a bot farming for the soviets, as TovarishToNy pointed out;
or would become experimental alt-history balance fest (Almost with AK-47s at this point). Not something most of us would want, I am sure.
Reserve him for korea
According to DF, every non-glorious Soviet nation is offendin and on par with cubism.
if we do korea you could look forward to the m41 walker bulldog light tank with the tnt equalivent of the HE, at least according to WT, being higher than the tiger 1
Yeah for the sake of balance between USSR and Japan I guess Khalkin Gol would be more suitable.
