True, but that wasn’t my point.
Well my point is, Tiger 2H is basically equivalent to KV-1. It is just exception.
In all other cases, BR3 tanks have a similar chance of destroying BR5 tanks as BR1 tanks have of destroying BR3 tanks.
1 Like
Japanese tanks do struggle with American tanks.
HO-I can’t even penetrate Grant or Lee which is on the same damn BR.
Well, Japanese tanks are completely different story. Because they’re just placed on completely inadequate BRs.
Chi Nu is BR2 tank that has been put on BR4. It’s literally equivalent to Pz III J1.
This is purely and solely due to the fact that DF quite obviously rushed Jap tech tree to BR5 as fast as they could.
Japs do not have any proper BR3 and BR4 tanks. Even tho chiri and chi to would be great candidates for it.
2 Likes
Well, that was exactly the point I was trying to make.
Glad that we agree with each other without realising it.
I don’t play as the Japanese, yet I would say back in the days I never felt like a Grant was a serious threat to my back in the day Panzer III J.
Honestly the Panzer III J since it is BR1 seems to mess up the German BR expectations.
Its gun isn’t great, but its also far from terrible.
Its turret turn speed is horrible, yet since it is BR1 I don’t mind.
The armor however is the weird part.
50mm frontal armor for the main BR1 tank.
BR2 tanks still have 50mm of armor.
And BR3 tanks ALSO still have 50mm of armor.
Germany is special as such that BR1 - BR3 vehicles have the same armor protection.
BR of tanks are based on cannon rather than armour. There are some exceptions like Jumbo but only because the community complained about it.
I don’t think this is a reasonable observation…
by that logic Jagpanzer IV L70 should be just as Panthers BR4,
Matilda should be just as A13 BR1,
Churchill should be just as Crusader BR2.
Jagdpanzer IV L48 should be just as Panzer IV J BR3.
The vehicle BRs are all over the place, this being based on their main guns is a weird argument.
BR1 can fight BR5 without any problem. And there is no problem. Weak players have a problem, especially those who compare Enlisted to BF or CoD, and Enlisted should be compared to HLL or PS.
The more often I read such whining, the more I become convinced that the game should be even more realistic and crush weak players.
As a seasoned hll player;
I take this statemant as a disgusting insult to hll
maybe for those who uses aimbots or other hacks. Listen to youself. br1 fight br5 without any problem. the only kind of people I think you are is the sniper monkeys that only stay back and snipe. Which is the most horrible teammate forever
So that explains why m10 and m18 are at br 4 while they both suck
1 Like