Rewards for completed tasks should be received automatically

Yeah, but boosters will keep causing frustration… There’s so many topics crying about getting conquest or already progressed match while having active booster.

In WT, boosters weren’t time limited (meaning you could activate them years after obtaining them). I guess it wasn’t very convenient for Gaijin, so they did introduce us expiration.
In Enlisted, we can’t even choose when to active then (not counting primarily paywalled BP boosters).

I really don’t think we could ever get to the point in which boosters would be anything healthy for Enlisted players.
Currently they’re just another passive artificial pressure for them.
That’s why I would rather completely get rid off them and rather making classic exping more healthy a friendly to player.

I just don’t think both are possible. And I would appreciate more healthy exp environment than option to have boosters.

Completed tasks (stars) should be automatically awarded no matter what.

Rewards could be collected automatically, but my gripe about the boosters is their stupid arbitrary 18h expiration.

Why not 24h at least? Now, if I unlock a booster with my last match for the day, I do NOT collect it, or it would be completely wasted.

Mate… If boosters were actually intended to be player-friendly, expiration wouldn’t be a thing in the first place. Using logic here is completely meaningless. It’s intentionally set to 18h and not 24h.
It’s just another FOMO artificial practice how to keep player playing the game.

Boosters aren’t healthy for players and never will be.

2 Likes

such time limits on such things are completely unnecessary

I saw one suggestion that we should be able to apply it to whatever match we play after the match ends, without expiry, but once used, then it’s gone

the problem currently is that the Battlepass cannot be checked if the player does not first receive the task reward for completion, that seems like a weird condition and should be a separated thing as they are two totally different activities and need their own individual button

1 Like

Yep, that’s basically in WoT currently. If you have active premium account, you can 5x per day activate booster after battle.

It’s player-friendly only because it’s behind paywall.

Paywalls are rarely player friendly though, let’s be honest :rofl:

they are corportate friendly though :ok_hand:

I mean the way this concept works is player friendly, there’s literally no downside.

That’s why it is worth for company only if player is paying for it. Otherwise it would be completely illogical to implement something like this. Since every free exp/currency are lost money for company.

It’s completely reasonable things like this are in F2P concepted game tho.
Not every game could rely only on selling skins, especially WW2 themed game.
WW2 theme really isn’t so popular as it used to be.
(Trash AAA WW2 games really doesn’t help btw, quite opposite. It makes look ww2 theme even less popular than it actually is.)
So we should be really glad for games like Enlisted, HLL and so on…

I really hate when people are comparing prices etc with popular games like Fortnite or single player AAA games. It just isn’t comparable.

Cry more
maybe you weren’t there when customs first came out.
Full xp with 10v10 bot matches, people farming bots on D-Day 5 min after it came out. After 3 hours it was impossible to create new custom match due to all slot being taken by single players farming bots.

Some of them used booster, and even selected maps on which bots got stuck, farming endless waves of bots with boosters fo absurd amout of xp.

Few hours later xp reduced, number of bots was reduced, players who got most xp got their progress rolled back.
So for people who wanted to chill in 10v10 bot games, even without xp as not everyone cared, custom games were gutted.

Here we are now, with custom games available for year, and rules are clearly laid out:
10 players in game for full xp, (some other small rules apply)

So it’s clearly intended just as sending weapons from other campaings to Stalingrad to have them without full access pack.

Also 10v10 custom games are way harded to get good score on, compared to lucky match where you play against bots and can get much more score, to compare 10v10 marshall game


to lucky pacific game where we had bots on our team that didn’t steal most of the kills

Even with less boosters it could be better to find random lucky bot match than to play 10v10 against good players.

And guess what, if you don’t want to play random maps, you could create your own match with maps you like. If only there was such options in enlisted. Surely devs will implement it some day

It’s obvious exploit.
Creating customs only for the pure reason of abusing BP booster system.
Doing specific action in match for the biggest income of experience.

Those customs weren’t created to just enjoy games with community.
Map with biggest chance for getting more exps was intentionally chosen according to your previous messages.

This is pure exploiting of imperfect ingame system.

Let’s play a game,

guess which score was on custom game, and which on normal matchmaking.
1


2

3

4

5

6

it’s obvious you are butthurt about getting conquest on booster match, so good job trying to ruin it for everyone

i suffer, so millions must suffer

He ain’t the only one bro. If he only was.

More russian games. This is common for them not doing anything about it.

Literally anyone with half working brain could figure this out year ago.

We know suffering is intended in gaijin games.

But to advocate for more of it is unhinged

Lol.

And now he’s insulting other players for not exploiting the game, wow.

could =/= would
is english like your second language, or you try really hard to not read right

most players don’t care about booster, why would they think about how to use them in best way

also thanks for coming out as brainlett yet again