Because it is
Having a fucking tracker on a player, and then being able to see and kill him through walls is kind of like wall hack
Yea
And atleast i have them unlike you
Is not a wallhack, because if this is a wallhack all marking system is a wallhack, so i cant accept that as an sensate argoument aganaist the tank marker, and i keep consider you biased and altered at this point
And now stop reply you dont win a medal and i dont want keep writing aganaist nothing
Keep it the way it is, its a good way to get the jump over tanks in the grey zone, so it’s a good thing in my book.
2 Likes
Again we disproved you on this like an hour ago
The only mark that tracks people is the tank one
The regular mark stays stationary, meaning if the markes target moves it doesnt follow it
Neither will you
So dont write if you dont want to, i dont care either
Yea because see a rallypoint or a defensive gun behind wall/hill/map is not wallhack, ok 
As i sayed your argoument is biased, is invalid
The Italian can write so much here because a pizza in 500°c takes about 90 seconds to bake.
Topic: Yes.
Its not a player lmao
Its a building. Do you even believe what youre talking yourself?
As i have proven for the 1268th time, you didnt even have an argument, that hasnt been disproven easily
Sit
You want an argoument
Tank marker is ok and good because a lot of time even too much, your team is unable to deal with greyzone tank camper wo after a hit they escape and change position, the marker help me to keep him in sigth and keep spam v on him for give a chance to someone to kill him, make the marker static semplify only the life of greyzone tank
But obliviusly you already know this but still because you dont like it, it need removed right
So keep bark for make the gameplay more unbalanced
Well you described a bot match
Now in a match with players?
Again i have disproved your weak ass arguments so many times and you just ignore it its hilarious
Anyway i really dont care anymore, so i probably wont respond anymore. You have your op i have mine. I think youre wrong but ehh. I dont like this mechanic and it shouldnt exist. End of story
I posted one argoument, in opposition to your wallhack/cod feature, rage rant
Good escape by 
Hey exactly the argoument one have use for explain wy something is bad for the game
“I dint like it kek”
Next you ask wy i say your opinion is invalid? Lmao
I made like 20 posts on this topic why it is bad
Fine ignore them. Dont really care
Yea reasumed they say
For me is
- wallhack
- arcade feature
- cod feature
- i dislike her because yes
So many good argoument
Rigth
Ok here’s an idea to meet both in the middle.
Tank markers move as long as the person who marked it has line of sight to the tank, once the tank leaves line of sight or the marking person loses sight of it, the tank marker goes stagnant unless someone else marks it.
1 Like
or it could be that if you mark the tank with the binoculars the tank mark will move with it, and if you mark it without binoculars it will only mark the last position seen
so the binocular will become a more useful tool
1 Like
nah you just like to skullfuck tankers probably 
I like see it, where is
Not… were is 30 sec ago
well, in real battle comunication went like this, people would get informed of the position of a threat, it’s not like it appeared a magic mark on top of it following it
Is a game dude, not real battle
VIDEOGAME
I know but… I think we simply have different views about it, nothing really to talk about much
1 Like
Exactly