Just like any tank if you shoot it in the cannon…that’s a Super Pershing thing and every tank has its strengths and weaknesses
The KT has no weak point like the Super Pershing from the front, you can’t even hit the KT from the front with some American BR5 tanks, but the Panther can easily one-shot it from the front.
Apply what we Panzer IV J/H Tankers had to do against the Jumbo…
Oh Jumbo, I remember once I ran into one of them while riding a Tiger E, we both fired about ten rounds at each other without either of us getting seriously hurt XD (Tiger E has less penetration than Panther).The difference between the BR3 and BR4 tanks is huge on all sides, the Americans can’t do anything with the Sherman against the Panther (the 105 is a Howitzer, I’m talking about regular tanks), so the comparison is wrong.
I gave you an example of what we German players had to do with the allied Jumbos when there were no Tigers and Panthers., It has the 90mm of the Super Pershing that penetrates 230mm that can easily penetrate the blind Front of the Tiger 2H Turret (185mm) and you still complain that there are disadvantages … Now any Low BR tank if it destroys the Tiger 2H’s Gun can immobilize it and then destroy it with luck
Stop comparing tank vs tank, it’s not all about firepower and armor, if that were the case, the IS2 would be the best tank in the game, but most players prefer the T3485 in BR4.
Remember, only the Super Pershing can destroy the KT from the front among American tanks. But many German tanks can destroy the Super Pershing from the front, even the Panther in BR4.
Also, the KT is much stronger against infantry, with more bullets and a faster reload speed.
Have you ever played with Super Pershing or do you judge them by their stats on paper?
Returning to the topic, the 88mm Pak 43 is necessary for Germany in BR V And there is nothing to stop it When Developers Promised Bigger AT Guns and Germany Received NOTHING
Yes, I have no problem with its addition, but other countries also need more suitable ATs.
1 Like