its called the type 97, not tyoe 92, stop typing like you’re drunk and maybe i’ll take your argument more seriously
the type 97 isn’t busted or overpowered, its just actually a good AT rifle that seems busted because every other AT rifle is complete trash
god forbid we empower infantry to fight against tank spam, am i right?
Fine the type 97 is not overpowered but the s100 is a step above the type 97 which is a step above all the other at rifle. Second 92 and 97 is not drunk typing stop mirroring you own flaws onto other. Just because you can drink type perfectly or never get a weapon wrong. It’s nearly 50 percent more armor penetration the ptrs and 30 percent the type 97. The type 97 may not be overpowered but the s100 would be without the penalty. Stop trying to power creep the meta and act like it’s normal. The s100 is already the strongest br1 anti tank weapon why does it need to be stronger. It’s only rival the ptrs is a sad joke in comparison and the less said about the boys rifle the better. So until both The ussr and us get a rifle that can compete with the s100 as is it should stay as is.
The there is magazine size 5 7 10 by you definition all semi auto rifles 10 and under would be not be br 4 or 3 even 2 but 1. The s100 is supposed to be br2 without the winning it was the only ay rifle at be,2 it would be. You got it lowered to br1 now you want to buff it. You want a buff a get br1 at weapons as good as the S10 for us and ussr or move it back to br2. It’s not about buffing br1 at weapons it’s about doing it for only one faction that already has the best br1 at weapon