Lol you’re just trolling now. 
if the premium account does not contain additional slots, I will not be able to support the developers? I wonder why? There’s still premium tech here. premium squad. battle pass. cosmetic. buying slots. buying company levels. buying everything.
And you’re saying they still don’t have enough? ridiculous.
1 Like
No, it’s a serious question.
You made a statement and I think it’s wrong. So deffend it or abandon it.
Pay-to-progress is not pay-to-win is my point. All of those things you listed are progression or cosmetic boosts. The only case to be made is the premium squads but you can get a full squad of 4 star soldiers with 4 star weapons that rivals a premium squad.
And if someone wants to pay $30 for one squad, in one campaign (the same cost as a full title for another game) then yeah, they can skip ahead in the grind.
1 Like
Oh gotcha haha!
Well you misinterpreted a few posts back. I wasn’t saying a Level 1 rifleman has a fair shake at going against going against a premium squad. Same reason a free-to-play Level 1 campaign player has a disadvantage to a free-to-play Level 20 campaign player.
What I meant is that if I’m sniping at a squad, it isn’t going to make a huge difference if it’s a premium squad, a low level squad, or a maxed out standard squad. They’re not invincible.
1 Like
I agree. Therefore, I want to stay only Pay-to-progress. That is all
2 Likes
People arguing this game is pay to win.
I present you the P-47. The most OP plane in the game. It’s not even a premium and EVERYONE can get it.
So where is it pay to win?
Like some people have said, you can easily kill any premium squad with a default BA soldier. If you can’t do that, then it’s a skill issue on your part.
1 Like
I agree comrade
1 Like
Allow F2P players to have unlockable squad slots through grinding and let anyone drop the vehicle slot minimum like most Japanese tanks are trash while planes are useless where its better to have an extra infantry squad instead.
Agree, forcing players to accept some ridiculous things has never been a good tactic in order to gain support or money (?). Even if you want to go full infantry with the premium account wouldn’t be so bad. They need to give the OPTION to choose what or how you wanna play.
1 Like
I present to you the flamethrowers in Tunisia. The best squad in the company and the best flamethrowers in the game.
Pay-to-win arguments are possibly more boring than historical accuracy arguments. Nobody bothers to provide a solid definition on the term, and since the most basic premise of the argument is unclear; everyone just talks past one another and the whole thing just goes in a big circle with no hope for a resolution.
Eventually everyone will get tired of talking to themselves and the argument will peter out with no resolution and with everyone still firmly holding their original position.
I think they should just make their money selling cosmetics and give us something like the Stalingrad all access pass (without the locked levels), but for the whole game. Anything else people should be able to grind out.
1 Like
agree
I agree with all of this.
I may agree with the last bit (not quoted) but need to think that through.
+1 it’s dumb that we always have to have at least one tank/plane even tho we don’t need them.