Please give me the quotes in which they specify they agreed. I checked the entire god damn thread and no, Mooelu and co were just responding to me and Erika, not to the origional thread topic.
Maybe they would be in favor, or against. They did not specify and as such are not counted.
I might consider doing so if you had shown me the same courtesy last time I asked you to substantiate something. But until further notice, that bridge has burned. I’ll give you just the same amount of assistance you gave me: Go and find them yourself.
As said, I did not find them. I did look.
And asking someone to dig up year-old documents on an old PC that they no longer own is hardly comparable to asking someone to read a forum thread they are already typing in. But I guess reading is too hard for you?
Apologies to _, this is now the worst bait I’ve seen all day. Take your salt somewhere else.
Just because you don’t agree with it, it doesn’t make it bait. People are allowed to have different opinions.
If someone specifically tries to insult me by saying that I’m incapable of reading, that’s bait. Even if it is their legitimate opinion.
Well of course. As you refuse to simply read.
And the colorblind stuff I mentioned was later confirmed anyways so I don’t really get what you’re getting on about, other than just being salty about me refusing to contact the guy that bought my old PC to ask him whether my formatted disk somehow still has docs on it 
I’m going on about the fact that you yourself didn’t give me the source for your claim. And the person who confirmed it didn’t do so either: they simply shared where they got the basis for their claim from. And if that is truly the only way you could have possibly proven your claim, then yes, that is what I’m salty about. But I think what I’m truly salty about is that you didn’t give me the source, even though it is probably easily available to you. And that’s just contemptible. Unless you want to say that it is to hard for you to use google ?
See what I did there ? This is entirely pointless, and I hope you understand that and will provide sourcing for your claims in the future.
No. As said, it was a pdf on my old PC which I formatted and sold. I no longer have the doc.
It’s pretty time consuming to find a suitable doc, I’m already spending too much time as is on these forums.
Then, instead of those badly researched, overly long posts which mainly consist of you taking things out of context, why don’t you spend this time with something productive and provide sources for your claims when asked for them ?
I don’t take things out of context. I just quote the stuff I want to respond to.
I can’t help it if you guys decide to post 50 posts from your reply onwards.
Am I the only one who has straight up not noticed this thing at all??
Flinch? Probably not, when I get shot I’m most likely dead or downed.
you’re not the only one.
although, you notice this factor more when your characters somehow survives, and than you try the same with premium members.
1 Like
I had a Premium PPK guy flinch from a kar98 yesterday. Otherwise this happens to any of your guys when you get hit by an SMG.
And then
You are contradicting yourself. So are players getting expirienced or leaving?
This is not how the system works. WT and WoT is an example - there you have almost 100% assimetrical gameplay - mostly time there is more powerfull vehicles on the field - they are more ranked - have better guns and penetration. I hate it. In Enlisted you have a 100 % more chance to kill every enemy on battlefield by vanilla squad. Today I play 0% upgrade axis for grinding a cards. So i got once first place in the team and the second one quite often. Mostly couse my expirienced mate got more kills.
This is totally ruining everything you complain about.
With ZERO upgraded axis loadout WITHOUT A PREMIUM squad (I play enginers, snipers, simple assaulters with one mp20) i have huge amount of kills and first five position in ratio almost all time during 10 fights. I will bring a good video next time.
Flinch doesnt effect on any game.
I would not think that a soviet rifles have some advantages. Are you playing it at all, people? Stock weapon - 1907 carbine have a 14 damaga and a most inconvenient aim in the world. And two other guns - Dragoon rifle and m1985 have pretty the same drain aim. You just cant fight with it as you can do with every german rifle. Man, its feels so comfortably. Every axis weapon are friendly to the newbies. Not the soviet one.
Dragoon has the best sights in the game bar none. 1907 Carbine has very similar sights. Base k98 has ugly sights with the Pre-War ones being far cleaner. Idk what you’re on about saying they’re not user friendly.
The ones willing to stay and do all the hard work will be OP
And then everyone that joins after that will leave as they notice they will have to spend hundreds of hours to match the existing playerbase in fighting chances.
There the diffrence is not a M26 pershing vs a Leopard 2A6 like how it is in Enlisted
And the gewehr deals 13 - so yes, you DO have a damage advantage. Saying otherwise would be a lie. “Grass is always greener on the other side” - Sights are preference. I have no issues with mosin sights and would easily trade for the extra damage
Then deal then. I prefer to play good german aim though. The fact is MP41 have a better aim and recoil or you forgot it? And more damage - 5.7 > 5