Reinforcements received: Aviation

Yes, but it should be for the Mk Vc, but the thing is that in WT (Where the vast majority of the models are taken from) it does not have the ability to carry one, so I would not get my hopes up even though it should have them.

You get me, I love you

Again, yes… but, the thing here is that it looks that in-game we, for some reason, have the early type of Zero, we have the “A6M2 mod.11”, and again in WT it is limited to the 2 x 60kg bombs, if we could have it changed to the mainline A6M2 then we could get the 250kg bomb

Yet again, you get me and I love you

Here, maybe 4 x 50kgs as the G-6 currently have, and have it moved to BR II

Yes, but also have it moved to BR III, it is so outclassed by the Fw 190 and it has no business being higger than it

I also agree with all of this

1 Like

We have exactly A6M2 and not Mod.11 since mod 11 is not made for carriers its and early test series used in China that was not suitable for carriers. Many people think its mod 11 but its not they have missed the tail hook on the model but it has Foldable wing tips so its a bit of abomination but its supposed to be A6M2 since you start on a carrier :smiley:

Well well it can get 250 i think the US and Japan have 250 kg bombs x2 on theirs so its fine. But yes if its too strong can be reduced.

1 Like

Ewgh, I hope they fix it then, amalgams are never a good compromise

Well its not the only model that its mixed the M50 Reising has model with a mag that is 12 rounds but it has 20 inside :smiley:

2 Likes

Ah, yes haha I noticed that day 1, but it’s funny haha

1 Like

Consider me corrected, for some reason I thought it was a 250kg

F-4 with bombs at BR2 is kinda insane imo, it 100% needs bombs though, but its still a BR3 aircraft.

It used to be 250KG I believe, so youd be forgiven in thinking so. I havent used the K-4 in years in Warthunder either. Enjoy the F4 the most

1 Like

Yeah the F4 is my bread and butter for germany in WT, its an insanely good muiltirole.

2 Likes

Is it that much better than the E-7 or the F-1 & 2 tho?

Yes, insanely so, completely different level of aircraft.

Also, This might be just personal Preference. But Since I think in addition to the bomb, the cannon should be swapped to the 20mm. Gives the plane a bit more stamina (ammo), and higher velocity rounds to sling at jets…much more useful in the situation it finds itself

I like the idea of rockets. Maybe the 30mm from the K-4 can be put on the G-6 instead. bit of flavour

3 Likes

Tough - this isn’t the 109G - it is the 109K - and this is what it got.

If you want fantasy go play Warhammer

you do know that all 109s from the G-6 up have both configurations available :face_with_raised_eyebrow:…pilot preference

image

4 Likes

Just wanted to say Thanks for making my day, listening to feedback and giving my spit a bomb :+1::guardsman:

@Euthymia07-live @MajorMcDonalds

7 Likes

Yes it will make the plane unique since we dont have BF with rockets

Well G 14 and G 10 will have a bomb they will be also good against jets but yes the 20 mm are better vs jets.

1 Like

For reasonable Bf-109 Z1 this planned version cuts the BRV cake: Interceptor armed with five 30 mm (1.18 in) cannon and up to a 1,000 kg (2,200 lb) bomb load.

The second one with 2 30mm cannons but with 2 1000kg bombs maybe too.

And as assault planes, not fighters.

When did they add the bomb to the Spitfire? It’s kinda awesome now…and love the Canadian maple leaf on it since a lot of Canadians flew this.

2 Likes

It’s from Johnnie Johnson’s Canadian wing. He was a British ace pilot who flew with Canadian wingmen, (wing 144 and 127). Hence the lil maple leaf :slight_smile:

Note: Sally is adorable.

9 Likes

I wish we had adaptive camo for vehicles already and could see the Spitfire without the Invasion stripes
on pre-Normandy 1944 map

9 Likes