The Mk.X is a chunky plane, like its good, but its rockets alone arent that good, and if we can see the G-2 go down to BR3 again, I think we could see this too.
The P-38G is a plague at BR2, as a rocket spammer, its really good, but it also completely eclipses the other BR2 attacker options. I mean its an extremely strong fighter bomber atm, too strong, however it could do with a buff as well if it went up to BR3, hence the offered increased payload.
You mean most planes at its BR? Minus the few ones with broken flight models or no payload hence next to never seen? Not to mention even vs boom and zoom planes in this game, they just dont work since the lead indicator is insanely OP. Especially in a plane like the Su-2 which does have the luxury to just hold down the fire button and not stop pretty much for its entire flight.
Fighters which dont see the light of day for multiple reasons, not to mention that argument is invalidated with the state of soviet tanks, rifles and SMGs.
Not to mention, ever this small nerf would still have it remain the queen of BR2 CAS, only beaten out by the Su-2.
Sure they do, but dont fuck over the germans because of that. They need a break once in a while.
Well they can simply move it to fighter squadron from ground attacker. But I didnt touch it cuz a lot of US players wont be happy but you are correct. Its very strong ground attacker its the best ground attacker for BR II. The other one is IL-2. But if we remove the P-38 from BR II US have very bad fighter planes compared to Germany.
Well yes its a bit OP even on the event I have mention it but you can take it down with good Zoom plane just let him lose some energy on vertical maneuvers but yes it has like the IL-2 insane turn rate
Im playing BF and the Romanian Fighter are very good trade off since they are not having bugged controls like the Warhawk so right now allies have better ground attackers and Axis better fighters (without Japan) But German fighters are the best at BR II since the allies fighters the spitfires dont have good payloads. (well now the new one will change that )
Yes, but it should be for the Mk Vc, but the thing is that in WT (Where the vast majority of the models are taken from) it does not have the ability to carry one, so I would not get my hopes up even though it should have them.
You get me, I love you
Again, yes… but, the thing here is that it looks that in-game we, for some reason, have the early type of Zero, we have the “A6M2 mod.11”, and again in WT it is limited to the 2 x 60kg bombs, if we could have it changed to the mainline A6M2 then we could get the 250kg bomb
Yet again, you get me and I love you
Here, maybe 4 x 50kgs as the G-6 currently have, and have it moved to BR II
Yes, but also have it moved to BR III, it is so outclassed by the Fw 190 and it has no business being higger than it
We have exactly A6M2 and not Mod.11 since mod 11 is not made for carriers its and early test series used in China that was not suitable for carriers. Many people think its mod 11 but its not they have missed the tail hook on the model but it has Foldable wing tips so its a bit of abomination but its supposed to be A6M2 since you start on a carrier
Well well it can get 250 i think the US and Japan have 250 kg bombs x2 on theirs so its fine. But yes if its too strong can be reduced.
Also, This might be just personal Preference. But Since I think in addition to the bomb, the cannon should be swapped to the 20mm. Gives the plane a bit more stamina (ammo), and higher velocity rounds to sling at jets…much more useful in the situation it finds itself
I like the idea of rockets. Maybe the 30mm from the K-4 can be put on the G-6 instead. bit of flavour
…pilot preference
