This is still in the current advertising… smh
But it does recreate the atmosphere of World War II?
No pink hair, no metal hands, no generals runing around in the battlefield.
Authentic uniforms, mostly authentic weaponry (there are exceptions but theyre not the rule).
Maps are based on actual battlefields where those battles happened, vehicles are authentic (except jumbo), with a mostly realistic damage system.
The game is as advertised, it has cool and accurate battles
Well, the atmosphere is kinda recreated, so that one piece of advertisement is not that bad.
That one is “better”:
OMG - you actually BELIEVE it??!!
In what way - is it the careful planning that goes into the infantry attacks, the approach marches and the slow methodical move into contact all the while checking for enemy presence and trying to stay alive?
Or perhaps the scramble to save wounded comrades, and the complaints about army food?
Or is it the “atmosphere” of the Axis in 1945 being outnumbered, outgunned, lacking in air support and never having enough panzers?
Or Ivan in 1941 suffering the same (except for being outnumbered of course…)??
Maybe it is the NZ soldiers in Tunisia fighting in their full dres uniforms with a weapon that was stored 17,000km away in a shed in Palmerston North?
Or GI Joe using a Bren on Normandy beach while hiding behing a Jumbo?
Dark chocolate is still chocolate, so is white chocolate.
I understand atmosphere as something different than 100% historical accuracy. We all know that Enlisted fails in accuracy matters, but at the same time if you look at it you know that it is a WW2 game, not some wierd fantasy like BFV or COD Vanguard.
Like it was said before, there is no wierd cosmetics, no cursed guns, no Allied soldiers running with STGs etc. Those who know something more abut specific equipment, weapons, vehicles etc. will find a lot of mistakes, but more casual players will not care about that. They will see something that is consistent with their vision of WW2. And because of that I think that it is possible to tell that did their job, at least partially. They still should definetely slow down the gameplay and let us do something more than rushing the small points.
But at the same time there are still other pieces of false advertising that cannot be defended in such manner, just like the screen I sent for example. Those are the parts that clearly state that historical accuracy will be important for Enlisted, what, as we now know, is definetely not true.
This is a game not a fucking Mil-sim
Again its not a Mil-sim ITS a game, and it had to make parts that would be boring enjoyable. There is only battle depicted in the game so most of the downtime and preparations are non existant
Its from the time period, the squad isnt that common to see either
Oh no, you want to play with just 1 gun all the time? Rpetitive
The jumbo is annoying and shouldnt have been added, but some jumbos were prepared for the invasion of normandy and did see action in the closing stages of normandy
That’s a pretty low bar you’re trying to jump over … and of course there are allied soldiers runniung with FG42’s and MG-13’s etc - I’ve done it.
It may look a bit like WW2 - but as you say, atmosphere is somerhing else again.
This has none.
It is an arcade game - with fast paced action, full of utterly a-historic weapons, uniforms, “units” and equipment all over the place. (not jsut “historially inaccurate” - but actually fantasy not existing at all weapons such as the PPK-42 - of which near and anyopne can tell 1 or 2 were amde - but you can buy a squad with 4 - right there you’ve got 2 or 3 weapons that never existed!)
TBH I believe anyone who thinks this has some sort of WW2 atmosphere probably hasn’t thought about what WW2 atmosphere would, could or should be like.
No, white chocolate is just fat and sugar, no cocoa.
heck even Arma is not realistic
This is just being nit picky
One and a half times more is not numerical superiority?
Take them to the courts for false advertising, lose your case and problem solved
What’s wrong in that?