I have the premium marine squad for when Pacific was released and its amazing fun at BR 2.
20 Round Thomspon with good handling like this one would have been enough
IMO
But i dont think the thompson is too bad…might just be preference But I still prefer most USSR/Germany BR 2 smgs over it anyway (and I havent used much but I recall some high capicity mags at BR 2 for japan)
M1A1 is bad in comparison to M1928A1, just like M1 is bad in comparison to M21/28.
I never understood what’s the point of those weapons, other than artificially increasing grind. Since you need to research them.
It’s kinda shame, because from my perspective those Thompsons are more iconic for WW2 than the better counterparts.
a case of iron sights make or break (for me)
This calls for a buff.
Why don’t you suggest some buffs they would need based on your experience?
i just looked on test server at what japan BR 3 line up will be…wow…looks great
If I were to buff them, it would definitely be handling related.
Yep, BR3 type 4 is going to be huge game changer.
I still can’t believe that they won’t be able to get into a higher BR.
But at least it means that even the BR3 Americans will have a pretty good chance of not going to BR4 if they get japs instead of the Germans.
And those BR3 shermans are really great tanks right now.
I’m honestly looking forward to all the BR3 lineups. Except maybe the Soviets, since not much will change there.
when they add 1 or 2 more planes At BR 2/3 Ill restart my grind 
Im waiting for some Twin engines
well honestly… there’s not much difference between br2 and br 3, for Japan…
It’s why I don’t think it will matter much. maybe bring a bit more ppl into playing the faction, fooling them that Japan has some advantage 
To those who know, Shermans are now the best br3 tanks 
it all changed with the better shells.
Its more about you know you cant see BR 4. So you can Play BR3 till your hearts content! ! Thats pretty valuable!
comparable, in my understanding, is not a difference of 1.5 times. It would be comparable if it were, for example, 3.3 and 3.8. That is comparable.
I’m so happy that all American tanks will be able to have that nice green of bomb sherman. (That’s not even possible in WT as far as I know)
That alone elevates them to a whole other level for me.
I am big tank camo lover.
Oh of course, if we lower ourselves to your level of understanding, we might obtain a similar rationale.
but see, there’s just more than reloading time. So many other things. Things you’re happy to ignore as usual, when it suits your chosen faction.
…
So! Did you try exploding the 3N by standing on it with a ptrs in practice range? We are still waiting!
I destroyed King tiger with AT rifle, so it can go on BR2 as a replacement for Pz III N. Plus it has much lower rof.
Well done!
That’s the kind of argument our dear friend mortarion keeps using, so it must be right!
For example what?
which one?
I only see T28E occasionally in BR2 since merge. I see Pz III N continuously in basically every match that involves BR2 GER.
That seems like it means something…
ahah textbook, I knew you’d do that:
really pathetic.
as for one example, number of mgs on said tank, for one. pretty important variable. T28E you deem so weak compared to 3N, has 3… always was a fantastic infantry deletion machine.
But of course you’d never admit that, eh.
Dude. If you’re making excuses for your bad arguments in advance, dude, it doesn’t work. I don’t have a favorite faction, I don’t have a chosen faction.
You overestimate the importance of the Machine Gun. This is just a small plus that does not change the overall picture.
dude dude dude. your arguments are bad dude, dude.
… really…
I don’t have to convince anyone here, it’s already well know how a major commieboo you are…
You overestimate the importance of reloading time. This is just a small plus that does not change the overall picture.
see? goes both way (dude).
(eh, how could having 3 machine guns be irrelevant on an infantry support tank. not just pathetic, but hypocrite as well.)
