This is a new map concept. Night battles, villages, and the home ground of paratroopers allow paratroopers to be deployed and airborne from the sky. The Germans will act as defenders defending the village. There will be some built-up anti-aircraft guns on the ground, as well as vehicles. Some light vehicles and light armored vehicles, and because they are villages, the map does not need to be too large, but the US military cannot use other army teams and vehicles except for airborne units and airdropped weapons, but it can be added to allow the communicators to call airdropped anti-tank The support of the artillery is sure to be very interesting.
3 Likes
I’d like to see bigger towns/city maps, kind of like how Berlin is now
2 Likes
No thanks - they have enough trouble getting basic mechanics right let alone introducing an entirely new one.
4 Likes
I like this d-day concept, but wonder how AI will act in the night situation, probably the same as a bright day light, laser aim and such.
They could provide some especific missions for Lone Fighters mode, and this Airborne drop could easy be one of them.
PS: The 82nd trooper hang on the church would be a nice detail on the map.
2 Likes
Complains about bots, wanna introduce sth. on a mode which is full of bots either.
2 Likes
1 Like
1 Like
Lone Fighters is much more interesting, remove bots and promote it, people would join, but no, majority says that Enlisted is different from others ww2 games because of bots, yeah, have fun then.
1 Like
lone figther is full of bots and i play it from time to time so i saw it, enlisted so differs from other ww2 fps as you said for the bots, the bots were advertised as the cornerstone of the game, remove them? I don’t see why.
lone figther interesting? is the bad copy of rs2 / verdun and I prefer playing rs2 / verdun than suffering on lone figther.
am i a troll? no I am one who likes to have fun playing without suffering and i like meme.
2 Likes
The game advertises bots. Bots are more or lese the sole unique thing of Enlisted (okay the RNG in the logistic is also unqiue but not advertised).
LF Mode wasnt even planned to exist and only (used to) exist to appease like three or four morons on the forum and died quickly after its introduction duribg CBT.
We dont need a poor designed RO Mode nobody (even the devs) at the first place.
Without bots you would probaly never face full matches.
2 Likes
Do you like dumb bots and believe they will be great some day? Great…nothing more to say, the game will die faster, in 2021 most people prefer PvP fps with actual players not robots.
I wouldnt be surprised if they actually remove them, bots dont make profit and they are a waste of resources that would be better used on game mechanics, maps, weapons etc.
Academy is about to be removed soon, the game is at beta, anything can change, Gaijin(darkflow) doesnt care if you really want AI or not, they need results and a viable game.
For me bots are only good for empty servers option, not to be the main thing.
But enough of offtopic on this guy’s idea for airborne troops who is actually good.
I think the robot teammates are still necessary, but currently there are not many commands you can do. Soldiers don’t even find cover by themselves. Even so, at least the player can command them to find cover instead of watching them go to death. , Such a squad leader or team leader (I don’t know how they position the player’s role) is a feeling of helplessness and helplessness.
Since you are like the only one who cries about bots in general…
The market wins again.
Why? Cause you dont like them?
The majority is fine with the concept of bot squads otherwise they wouldnt play it.
“BuT tHeRe Is Lf”.
Yeah. Which is so popular that bots have to fill in the ranks so people eventually get matches.
Academy wasnt really a “core” feature of Enlisted to beginn with. Also it was never really liked by the majority
In betas you dont change/ remove the core concepts of the game but rather fine tune them (at least thats how betas should work). The bots are working more or less. Ofc they are to some extend retarded but they work way better than in the past/ CBT.
Yet the game seems to be viable enough.
We have at least 14k people who are hardcore fans and/ or invested gold/ money to buy the PPK-42 squad = game and core concepts is/ are to some extend popular.
Any other F2P WW2 game which has similiar numbers?
HnG? Lol no. Enlisted is full with HnG vets. WW2 Online? No (at least according to steam charts).
Which is why LF is full with them ^^
I mean where are thiose fancy “remove bots” or “praise LF” threads? There are rare and mostly get hated to the ground.
2 Likes
The game isn’t even at steam, most people dont even know it exists, marketing is very bad. Only some youtubers promote it.
And that of course thats doesnt help to increase player numbers, many people try one or two matches and quit, check social networks besides this forum and you will see. Most of them quit because of lack of true players, not challenging matches with stupid bots.
But keep arguing same old stuff, and see where it goes.
H&G got bots “recently” for lack or players to fill the match, Enlisted has bots from beginning like it would make a difference.
Bots in the end are the only way to some people enjoy the game by killing someone, even devs said that before, without them bad players would rage quit lol.
People will still prefer milsimulators like HLL or true arcade like BF or COD, Enlisted wants to be different but fails to deliver its promisses.
Main reason are blind fanatic like you, who insisnt on a failure game feature that doesnt have much where to improve. End of discussion.
So a game has to be on steam to be popular?
There are more than enough reasons not to use steam as store/ plattform (eg. you have to share your revenues with Steam, restrictions in terms of content-creating and their algorithm)
Ever heard of Twitch? Also just cause some YTers and Streamers play HHL/ Enlisted doesnt mean that people are (not) going to play it otherwise HHL and Enlisted should have millions of players.
Both HLL and Enlisted fulfilled their crowd-funding goals so why should they change their concept if their playerbase is more or less happy with their core concepts?
Typed Enlisted Remove AI Reddit (always open for more sources).
Like the best I found… ehm yes. I am impressed
But ofc you ignore the fourm because you know thatt he majority here is against you.
Ehm How about coming with numbers instead of your “feelings”? 42k Players and a low populated mode is “old stuff” cause you dont have anything against it except “muh feelings” huh?
Hehe Right. BFV was sooooo sucessfull… maybe because it wasnt on steam for some time hehe.
BF and CoD are both console main-franchise-consoomer products (and CoD became more or less a battle royal too which Enlisted isnt). Complete different situation as Enlisted is like the sixth game of Gajin (and the first shooter).
HLL is a walking sim (and still has less players than Enlisted). Maybe you are just playing the wrong game?
Core feature vs. feature which wasnt part of the core concept (excluding the old tutorial).
Show. Numbers. Which. Shows. That. Enlisted/ Bot Concept. Is. Unpopular.
Oh wait. Not all YTers are playing it and like three comments/ threads on reddit.
Or at least answer me this simple question/ questions (Question one is enough)?
Why is no one playing LF? Why was the LF mode never able to reach a popularity where it could survive without bots? Where are those masses of players who wanna get rid off the mode (aka silent majority™)? Why should they become a second HHL if the market/ community for WW2 walking sims is already more than satisfied enough with HLL (and to some extend PS)? Why should they abandon sth. which seems to work economical?
3 Likes
You are the one with that feelings stuff, selling 42k doesnt mean that we have that kind of playerbase today, you dont have actual numbers indeed, i see more or less empty servers and they added another campaign, Tunisia to split even more the low playerbase.
They have CRSED already at steam and gaijin has war thunder too there, now it sucks?
CRSED is a joke, but thats not bad, it was a test for Enlisted.
At least on Steam we would have public stats for playerbase which we dont have today.
You simply cant show how many people play daily Enlisted to say that has more than HLL, even if its true, no wonder, comparing a paid vs free game.
I never said i want Enlisted to be like HLL, but its could be what BFV failed to do.
Insisting in AI is the same.mistake that RETO made with non-sense RTS mode for H&G, trying to be different in the market, but lets see who is right in the future…
Oh, you mean BF2042?
Yeah, it will probably give players BFV they wanted. It’s great projet honestly, I wonder how it will turn out because it’s EA after all.
Moscow and Normandy are pretty full. Issue is that since OBT started the quality of players significanty dropped which is why people often mistake them with bots. Bots have the name “name-name-1234.”
Berlin and Tunisea failed/ fails cause DFs concept of CBT 2.0 failed (paying 50 bucks again for squads you might not even want and testin a broken campaign where you cant even grind) and at least Berlin is “pretty” unbalanced and bugged AF (which unlike the bots has been mentioned million times already).
And yes. The 42k are not that reliabe (unlike steam charts etc.) but then again its more than you have and one of the few numbers we have rn.
Again show me your numbers/ sources which proves your point instead of just coming around with “doesnt mean”.
CRSED is a battle royale. BR is a different thing which (usually) attracts different people.
And I dont know if it makes sense to compare Enlisted with CRSED. Sure, “same” engine and maps but I cant remember the time where I faced a female badass preacher creating Nazi zombies in Enlisted.
I agree there but again I can understand why they dont release it there (yet) or why publishers/ devs generally dislike Steam.
I mean you started the whole comparison part there.
Enlisted made a sucessfull start while BFV already failed with their first trailer which became a internet meme and was the major reason why the pre-order sales were pathetic.
I do not really worry about Enlisted becoming BFV (even the Panzer IIIB, BA11 and the Jumbo were more historical than Dice’s biggest failure).
Its more or less the sole (F2P) arcade WW2 game on the market and if Enlisted sucks, we would see it on the market. Yet the market is (with the exception of Enlisted) pretty empty and dead.
Good one. You know why HnG failed with the RTS? Cause they didnt touched it after the Soviets with the exception of the glorious queue fail. They never realized that the war mode was the sole thing which make their game unique/ interesting or do you really wanna tell me that the awful (and the low amount of) maps, awful gunplay, awful vehicle hitboxes, awful servers, awful graphic, awful credit system…
Actually this game was (since 2017 if you ask me) and is just awful. RTS was at least interesting because it generated interesting battles (ressources wise).
You know Fog of War (released around 2018)?
Basically RO2 but with nothing really unqiue. Capping and defending. No real roleplay, no RTS. Like I said its mechanics were basically copied from RO2.
Died after like two months.
i feel called out
2 Likes