This sounds like a skill issue
4 Likes
And you have a math problem.
Edit: So even fools shut up with statistics. Why didn’t I use this method before?
Making the FG-42 and FG-42 II actually viable? Yes please. Germany already has mid-worst infantry gear in every category, they need a buff (especially since body armor makes the FG require 2-tap)
7 Likes
+1 to damage buff and historically accurate RoF. But give 20 rounds magazine to AVT-40, so soviet mains don’t complain.
1 Like
yes this. and remove body armor. every one will be happy.
2 Likes
Here we go again this post explains why FG is tecnically inferior to AVS-AVT
3 Likes
Yea … Just a little bit
Seems that is ur preffered faction lul
Well I read your text
The things you mentioned are correct
But 5 more bullets and less recoil compensates for everything and gives FG an advantage
The only thing that causes problems is body armor which I believe should be removed, body armor is not abundant and most players do not use it and in the end it does not make a big difference in balance, but it is an unmanly advantage and removing it is in everyone’s interest, even the Soviets (because I’m sure they are tired of the Germans crying)
Doesnt matter if soviets don’t use the armor is cuz they don’t know how it works or they are dumb as hell
Still an adventage and if used well u can just have a good adventage over half of ppl on the Game
Bruh why 5 bullets more should be an adventage if i know that those 5 Will miss cuz the ridicolous dispersión?
Alsot the Rof of this weapon is a curse rather than a adventage since u Will reload half of times + recoil becomes rubbish…
According to statistics, the Dispersión of AVS and AVT is higher.(FG 42 II: 0.22 | avs:0.28 | avt: 0.26)
what?
Not remove it as cosmetics, just remove their Persona 5 jrpg stats that make them take less dmg per hit and sometimes bounce shots against them.
1 Like
Well, yes, I mean its effect, not itself.
2 Likes
Well the clan members like EVA ect all agree that
Without armor
1 T20
2 THA
3 AVS/AVT
4 FG-42/II
And armor
1 T20
2 AVS/AVT
3 THA
4 FG-42/II
In both both variants of the FG fall dead last
9 Likes
You know what needs to be done?
Make all of the tech tree SF rifles share the exact same stats, everything the same, excluding the 3D model, would change the type Hei Auto, AVS and AVT to have 20 round mags aswell…
Now to what actually needs to change, they should nerf them heavily, they should not be leagues better than BR 4 SA rifles, being an all in one super weapon with no downsides negates the purpose of all other types of guns at BR 5. The power jump from BR 4 to 5 is currently insane, this change would help alleviate that by quite a big margin.
They should be mainly used as high capacity semi auto rifles that can use full auto in emergencies and when braced.
Constantly buffing SF rifles over the years was a big mistake that led to nothing but a big pissing contest.
3 Likes
so you want to buff every aspect of the gun, but only the rate of fire is historical accuracy, if you have more then 50% of youre gameplay in the german faction youre opinion is troublesome
I’d rather seperate BR5 from BR4, since BR5 super weapons are really fun to play with 
2 Likes
Sometimes I wonder if you do. You were pretty vocal that the panzer IIIn was faster and had better mobility than the T-28 aswell. (Nope)
Body armors not that rare in casual MM. Veterans carry games, and veterans tend to run full bodyarmor because they know what it does…ive seen so much of it these few weeks
8 Likes
They are indeed, but they grow old very fast and make BR 5 stale.
That will never happen in the current state of the game.
I still stand by my previous words, a big nerf is needed for SF rifles.
The table you use is not actual AFAIK.