Proper BR-map links when +-1 BR MM is implemented

[Wieloglow]

@Veekay45

Kursk was not just Tigers and Panthers. They were not even the majority there.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. 260 Panthers, 210 Tigers and 90 Ferdinands.

1943 battle in BR 1 - perfect for a player who has just downloaded the game

[CaptainSebekel]

Tell that to the people queuing for Europoor Town.

[Tabbot]

@Veekay45

• BR 6 would be implemented with ±0 BR MM and all the fake stuff like T-34-100, AS, RPD, DP with belt, Fedorov MG, HoRi, Tokyo SMG, Auto Hei that was not even serially produced/built or used in WW2 together with whatever other things could be added like IS-2 or Maus would go to “Operation Unthinkable” BR6 map(s) and wouldn’t mix with other BRs.

I’d want “Operation Olympic” and some kind of “Germany: 1946” camapaign before “Operation Unthinkable”,

also Budapest/Hungary and Vienna/Austria, along with Anzio/Northern Italy. and Siciily.

[kkang2828]

But this is not supposed to be a “historically accurate” WW2 game. At least not anymore. Go play Squad 44 if that’s what you want, and leave us semi-casuals(who want something that’s more authentic and sensible then the CoD/BF madness, but not too hardline HA at the same time) alone.

[kkang2828]

I’d say it IS more or less an interactive museum of weapons nowadays. Just go and play Squad 44 if you’re not satisfied with Enlisted’s HA.

[Myrm1don]

@CRO_SkyGuard

I feel like they should introduce weekly historical battles with prefabricated loadouts and maps where all of those weapons and vehicles were used, maybe even remove a lot of the HUD and add friendly fire to make it feel even more realistic as well as large versions of the maps.

Myrm and Gastanos Battle of the Month Event: (Concept)

A Brief Preamble (Opinion)

Before we get on to the main idea, We would like to preface this suggestion with that a more “Permanent” way of earning old event rewards and Research XP/Event tasks by playing “Customs Games” is Preferable. As this has not shown signs of becoming a reality, this idea is like a Stop gap or a compromise that could easily fit into the game as it is now, as proven By April Fool events, Buying time to improve the core game that appears to be stagnating IMO A Breath of Fre…

[kkang2828]

@Veekay45

None of them were used.

So what? This is not really an “historically accurate” WW2 game anymore and it never will be again. Accept reality. I’m fine with it so I stay and play. It’s still miles better and more authentic/realistic than some CoD/BF madness. If you’re not fine, just go play something like Squad 44 where HA actually is the first priority(and most certainly will continue to be so).

[Lthiddensniper]

Dickers max never saw combat and had two built.
the T34 couldn’t take a 100mm cannon it didn’t exist.
Ho ri production never saw combat iirc
Type Hei Automatic Rifle blew up during testing.
the list goes on.
just because it existed doesn’t hean it needs to be here.

[gastanofrizzi]

@Lthiddensniper

just because it existed doesn’t hean it needs to be here.

Yes instead, in a past Q&A was confirmed that’s because (X) existed in the time frame of the game can be added and every old player can confirm this

[Lthiddensniper]

This would be great, I want HA but not that the game is no longer fun. Same as I’d wish BR 5 would cool down a little because it’s currently filled to the brim with things not used at all and explosives.
People’s definition of fun can be quite different from mine though.
bonus points if these historical battles were BIGGER!!!@

[Lthiddensniper]

I had stroke reading your sentence. but if I understood correctly let me answer
I’m a pretty old player and never heard of this.

[gastanofrizzi]

@Keofox

— Based on what, do you choose weapons and equipment for campaigns? For example, the M4A3E2 “Jumbo” was not used in the Normandy landings, but it is present for the U.S. side in the campaign.

The first weapons and equipment that appear in the campaign are those that were historically used in the battle on which the campaign is focused. They have absolute priority. However, there are situations when one of the sides clearly lacks some tool for good balance. Therefore, we use the following principle of adding content: if equipment and weapons existed during the battles reflected in the game’s campaign, they have a chance to appear in the campaign itself. To put it simply, the same Jumbo was created during Operation Overlord, which is the theme of the “Invasion of Normandy” campaign.

To put it more simply for now, because was builded in WW2 can be added

Also

@Lthiddensniper

the T34 couldn’t take a 100mm cannon it didn’t exist

The T34 100 in game use the LB gun you can see it by the kill feed, and this one was tested but scrapped in favor of the t44

[Adamnpee]

@Lthiddensniper

Dickers max never saw combat

Bullshit

[Lthiddensniper]

The it’s in the tanks description in the game one captured and destroyed by Soviets and one destroyed in fire.

[Lthiddensniper]

Does that say it worked? it worked when the war was over.

[gastanofrizzi]

The LB Variant worked before the war was over but the t44 was already planned for mass production by then, and because German was at the end of the gas soviet simply dint rushed the production of new tank, but both t44 and t34 100 was fully operative before the end of the war

The t44 entered in service in the 1944 by the way, do expect to see it in game to

[Adamnpee]

Dicker Max saw combat.

Dicker Max

[Veekay45]

@CaptainSebekel

The Model 1943 was already produced by end of 1943.

What is this supposed to mean?

“Model 1943” is T-34-76, not T-34-85.

@Wieloglow

1943 battle in BR 1 - perfect for a player who has just downloaded the game

100% better than BR4 where T-34-85 is time travelling from the future, because Pz II and Pz III were actually there at Kursk again T-70 and T-34-76.

@kkang2828

Just go and play Squad 44 if you’re not satisfied with Enlisted’s HA

Cool story bro. Can’t wait to go play Walking Simulator 44 where Eastern Front is not even mentioned.
If you call yourself a casual, why don’t you go play BFV? It’s literally a better casual game.

@kkang2828

So what?

So none of them were ever used.
You wanna argue they were used?

@Lthiddensniper

Dickers max never saw combat and had two built.

Wait how do you think it was captured by the Red Army near Stalingrad?

@Lthiddensniper

Ho ri production never saw combat iirc

This one was actually never built, never beyond a wooden mockup.

@gastanofrizzi

Therefore, we use the following principle of adding content: if equipment and weapons existed during the battles reflected in the game’s campaign, they have a chance to appear in the campaign itself.

Ho Ri never existed though? How does that work?

[gastanofrizzi]

@Veekay45

Ho Ri never existed though? How does that work?

Type5 Ho-Ri : The Japanese Ferdinand

It existed 5 was ordered and just one completed but never used, the test based on the pre production model Hori 3 was done and reported, those who never existed was the hori 1 and 2

[Kriegerfaust007]

From what i understand the bar is if a prototype was completed before the end of the war it can be in the game, as in built not but perfected or even accepted but functioning more than a mockup like a wooden tank.
that is it no production or combat requirement, it did not have to be issued to any troops much less front-line troop.
If you do not like that talk to the developers and do not complain here, argue for the rule to be changed don’t complain about the results
one br5 is going nowhere and br5 needs prototypes, second you get a lot more of the Thomson spam which has like seven in the game.