True. Pacific maps allow for long range camping unlike many western/eastern front maps. The heavy tank no 6 also feels lot better than normal tiger for this reason. Maybe in the future when japan gets Manila and Manchuria
1 Like
Well Ho-Ri main gun is insane it can take out Jumbo frontally so its very good tank. But all the Tiger I models should be moved to BR IV and given APCR cuz right now they are very bad…same with the Firefly.
:_:
no
i agree the us should get the tiger 2
2 Likes
No! What?!? Just No!!
1 Like
I want my German Sherman!
1 Like
granted standard sherman no 76 no extra armor
1 Like
a us king tiger is more realistic than the type 5 heavy
1 Like
No. While the Japanese Tiger may seem outlandish at the very least Japan did purchase it. Therefore it’s plausible for their arsenal
and never got it home while the us captured ‘multiple’ king tiges thus hand them in hand
its more real the way the fg42 is more real than the t20
I disagree with capture content, except modified or unique, because it can be a blanket excuse to just give anyone anything
I’m not entirely against the possibility of fully adding capture content and we get to the point with Germans spawning with Garands and Americans for Stgs, but I think we should keep all faction’s arsenals distinct as best we can
they purchased one tank without the ability to get it to Asia or make more, if a Japanese tiger is realistic an American king tiger is, not asking for tech tree event would be preferred but premium is ok. otherwise Japan should get tiger tank not tiger tanks.
how did japan ‘modify’ the tiger
I’m talking about things like the PPSh rechambered to Mauser ammunition or the KV 1 with a German gun.
Purchased content is allowed. Japan bought Kar98ks, Tiger, Panther, Panzer 3s, Stgs, etc. Also aid content
so any vehicle the us bought even one of counts so if i find the us or uk bought a t34 its allowed
Yes, could be interesting event rewards
One T-34 was shipped to the US from the Soviet Union (don’t use Russian it’s as egregious as saying Holland when you mean the Netherlands. Holland is the largest state/province in the nation of the Netherlands just as Russia was the largest unit inside the USSR)*.
The Soviet Union made many, 34,000, T-34’s but not enough extra to supply any ally.
The workmanship on the T-34 was regarded as atrocious. In subsequent versions of the M-4 tank the track width was increased lowering ground pressure and the 76 mm high velocity gun was installed possibly as parallel evolution or possibly because US Army evaluators found those T-34 traits good.
But overall the T-34 was not highly regarded by the Army evaluation team.
There is a story of a T-34 that was hit 9 times by German anti-tank rounds size unspecified but certainly 57 mm as the 75 and 88 mm anti-tank rounds would terminated
When the late model American M-4’s battled the T-34 in Korea, both sides with fairly green crews the M-4’s owned the T-34’s.
The Soviet Union did not have T-34’s to lend to the Americans and the American evaluation of the T-34 left no doubt that the Americans were not interesting in getting any T-34’s.
The USSR did receive several thousand M-4′ and the M-4’s were quite successful in Soviet service.
The KV-1 tank was a mystery even to the USSR’s allies, but it didn’t remain this way forever. Both the US and UK received a sample to study
WW2
r/TankPorn - The KV-1 tank was a mystery even to the USSR’s allies, but it didn’t remain this way forever. Both the US and UK received a sample to study
•
4y ago
If memory serves me right the UK liked the T34 and KV-1 enough to suggest mounting their 17-pdr gun on both and even ran some tests.
Yep thats right and they just got the tiger 1 cuz the panthers Didn’t make it there, so far i know
U.S. Army maybe yes it could, then i whould Tanking there too cuz the super Pershing is just Garbage, ok sry its a good Tank but not in game for me i like the tiger2H more then the Pershing.
Zolotye oboi.jpg
