Lol, wonder why this guy quote on quote “hasn’t noticed anything”. I could go on for years with you and provided evidence in the form of clips, but you’re not a dev. I’m not flooding a forum with my gameplay solely for the sake of one to one interactions in proving these points. You’re also just as senselessly toxic as all the other German players.
To be honest, I was advocating mostly on behalf of building a player base more healthily in the future, but the game actually has little to no future due to a multitude of reasons, some economical. You can see that elsewhere with some of the things I’ve said.
I personally have no problems myself, seems to be you’re impression I do, but usually most of you here just get you petty little egotistical attitudes in-between any discussion.
I could be toxic and say outright, if you can’t use the FG-42 to better effect in CQB than that’s just as you would say a “skill issue” but I don’t in favor of reasonability, even in spite of it being true. In games with values like this one as a word of advice, until rpm reaches around 1200 weapons with one bullet lethality’s void the use of things like smg’s, especially when considering every gun in this game at tier V has easy handling. Not to say you can’t use an smg by preference, they can still kill people, they just are pointless to have in terms of practicality and playing to win. The only exception is when you start dipping into rate’s of fire like bolt guns where it’s just below a threshold that it can be effectively superior in a fight with multiple opponents.
The real problem is like I said elsewhere, every tier V is innately skill less, most weapons have no character or individuality for this reason. Tier’s don’t exist in Normandy so you can just use whatever you want against entry level players.
Well you made the argument, the burden of prove is in your end.
Right, because I dont buy every bias argument you make
You almost got it, perhaps you should read about what bias means.
You base your entire argument on some situation aka 1v1 both reacts exactly same time, which so far you havent provided any evidence that it happes so frequently at any given range that we could say fg42 is better in cqc.
I mean we can spend rest of the day comparing things with your logic?
M2 is clearly better weapon in every aspect in cqc due to higher bullet speed if both reacts same time and shoots to head the M2 bullet hits first.
Same goes in long range, just shoot head and your bullet is faster than fg42.
Ironicly that probably happens more often than your argument of both reacting at exact same millisecond.
So are you now saying everyone should run with MG-15 instead ?
So it’s not a matter of you not reading, it’s just the case of a lack of comprehension towards legit anything I’ve said.
Here’s one for you that will tear you’re little biased based deflection world apart, I’ve used the premium T20E1. I don’t care about you’re ideology on how premiums should be if you object the fact they shouldn’t be pay to win than you’re wrong. It’s Overpowered, what does it have in common with all the other overpowered weapons? It’s ease of use is stupendously exaggerated all for the sake of appealing to players who pick it out as a premium. It too is a weapon with one hit kill values, for that reason combined with it’s range it’s definitively the best weapon you can have in you’re arsenal. I don’t think the game should operate to such an extent of ease.
I get you’re sensitive, that’s okay because all you see in anyone’s dispute is “Germany should be nerfed”, and that scares you deeply. What I’ve actually been trying to express is that the whole of the game needs adjusted, as for the FG-42 to M2 carbine discussion they just aren’t the same role. Can you weight the advantages yeah sure, but at the end of the day I’m never going to pick the one that’s functionally worse, well that’s a lie, I like to throw wildcards and pick funny things. lol
You’re dense as can be bud, I get the things I put are long and intimidating to some extent but in reading them you’re going to have to express a level of comprehension high enough to stop running in circles with yourself.
Well let me answer that question for you, only because were friends and all. Biased enough to literally be playing germany in between typing those things but I guess not biased enough to never admit the game has problems with weaponry, especially in distinction. I’m also not biased enough to deny things that are overpowered in other nations, as I’ve expressed. Still, biased enough to not play the Russians ever no matter how many premium squads they keep throwing at me. Though, still not biased enough to think the Russians don’t deserve anything. I hope that answer you’re question thoroughly enough.
Didn’t I already mention that the gun grotesquely overperforms and I have used it? Plus it’s a premium, which I addressed shouldn’t be as good solely for the sake of being a premium.
