Trying to understand this nonsense.
1 Like
He does.
It’s sarcasm 
2 Likes
Oh thanks god I was confused.
2 Likes
Although there’s STILL some retards out there that woud argue this wasn’t sarcasm but TRUTH, that Soviet side suffers greatly and ALL axis players are real life nazis:
2 Likes
That PPSh is shit due to high rof = wasting bullets was actual argument by certain soviet main back in days of mp40/mp35 vs ppsh.
Yeah.
2 Likes
Yes. The picture I posted is one of them.
I quote him:“ppsh41 is garbage, Kiraly is best smg ever, AVS is unusable because I can’t full auto at long range anymore”
Thing is I’m not even joking…
2 Likes
lol
1 Like
That dog guy is a Russian forum user, I’m sure he believes glorious Soviet Union saved the world and nothing could stop them.
1 Like
Sure, but decision to make a tank doesn’t mean tank takes part in a battle.
I would be glad to see a single record/photo of Pz IV F2 ever being present anywhere near Moscow. But by all accounts it wasn’t.
as said I dont recall t-50 being there either nor have I seen a single photo of t-50 being there.
So at this point its quite pointless to argue about “bUt hIStoRIcaLLy It wAsNT thEre”
Personally for me it’s simple: something like T-50 was on the Eastern front by December-January 41/42 - ok fine.
Something wasn’t even adopted (F2 / MKB) - darkflow poop.
ok so first it was
To add something it actually had to be there aka historically correct
AND now
Since the T-50 for example never was there now its fine as long as it fits to timescale.
Well we can easily fix this and convert moscow into eastern front campaign rather than specific moscow.
Lets say 41 - 43.
Yeah I know, currently darkflow is doing amazing job portraying the hardship soviets had during battle of moscow. Totally historically correct.
It’s not fine, but I can at least accept it with a grudge.
Which is absolutely not the case with stuff like F2 or MKB, when irl Germans had a shortage of even semi-auto rifles during Barbarossa and literally tried to copy SVT when developing G43.
Ah ok, but as long as it benefits soviets its acceptable right ?
Well il gladly give up every german semi auto if we also portray the shortages soviets had during that battle.
No I don’t simp for either of the sides.
If it’s a time traveller, it has no place here.
Yeah right let’s go that way…
You’ll probably want a 100 km march before starting up the game and a -30 C air conditioner next to you as well.
It’s a game. But it should be balanced and fun. Without fantasy time travelling.
They simply shouldn’t have added the T-34. End all campaigns at ~ level 25 to avoid power creep/fantasy.
Ah I see but t-50 driving from leningrad to moscow is fine as we all know how well the soviet tanks handled driving such distances.
No thanks.
And for the last year or so it hasnt been either.
Now the F2 might or might not make it more balanced and perhaps even slightly fun.
Yet at the same time you are against it.
Quite sure the T-50 was just as equally pain in the ass when it rolled in.
Again, the other faction has to take precise shots to deal with that while the other faction pretty much just sitted in middle of map as none tank was posessing much of threat to it.
VeRy BaLanCEd aND suRe sUpER fUn fOR otHEr fACtion
No T-50 was also 9/10 cancer. Historically plausible, but gameplay cancerous.
T-34 is 10/10 cancer because OP.
F2 is 11/10 cancer because fake to counter OP above.
plausible as die glocke.
flak 88 to engineers.
yeah such a shame soviets has to actually to do something else than sit in the middle of a map.
You can drop the “main” act. I play both sides equally.
At least that but not Back To The Future F2.
Tiger next, I guess because 1942.
yet your idea of balance & fun is highly contradictory favoring rather massively the other side.
Well why the fk not, id say its time for soviets to taste some balance for change.