why are you calling me a wheraboo for not liking that we get the starting rifle and the US gets a semi auto,can a man not bring up something he doesn’t like without being insulted?
2 Likes
Fg42 with grenade launchers, falling literally from the skies.
Use them.
1 Like
no, that did not exist and would break the game entirely like the p47 before the nerf times 100
Yeah,is an fg42 with a grenade launcher but here is the thing, you only have a few soldiers in that squad, and little customization for weapons, so you can’t get more than the 3 grenades on soldiers like you can with normal rifleman squads, and yes they are paratroopers, I don’t really use them that much just due to them not being able to clear the objective as fast and efficiently as the US paratroopers with their stupid 100 round guns, the grenade launcher is good, but is not really precise and made for close quarters, and besides, I’m not very good with fg42s anyways
1 Like
this is why, you are saying germany sucks because this one thing they don’t have complete superiority over the enemy -.-
2 Likes
Could the US just get the Springfield GL then instead of garand? No, you are going to argue against that, and i was not “bitchin” about it, just trying to make the grenade launchers better for Germany because they lack the power to be picked over fg 42s
1 Like
No, you are completely wrong, germany lacks in some areas, but doesn’t suck.this is a smaller detail and I just wanted to not have the starter rifle with a grenade launcher glued on to it for grinding months of your life while the other side has the same thing but better in almost every way. The USA and ussr are better than Germany in some aspects, but don’t crumble under the is2 or p47 entirely
1 Like
literally the same applies to the garand and the m2 carbine though why are you using the AT rifle grenades, literally any normandy AT weapon is better than those…one a related note i don’t think the springfield actually had AT rifle grenades handed to it
1 Like
So insulting me because I want something to be balanced when one thing is semi auto and the other is bolt action unlocked at the same teir? Why is it you get to run around calling people wheraboos insulting them you take offense at the slightest disagreement? I just want this small thing to be buffed to be on par with something, and I am being attacked with words
1 Like
Well I don’t have full perks unlocked for AT gunners, so no recoil reduction, and don’t plan to, so it’s better than nothing, an extra At weapon if I’m out of fausts, and an overpriced shissebecher for when I need to kill a group of enemies, and they can be used for the meme value of it though, gotta say, it would be bad to say you got killed by one of those in a tank
1 Like
here is the thing Normandy has more weird unlock patterns such as a shitty fighter versus an uber attacker (jug vs 190 at higher tiers and 110g-2 versus 38), the germans get a 40 round automatic weapon while the US gets a questionable primary, germany got an assault tank while the US got a shitty td, US got an assault tank armed with a potato gun while the germans got an ok medium tank, US got a more worse tommy while the germans got an AR ect ect.
det packs works so much better (cook them and throw them at the tracks for a near guaranteed kil), there is also tnt charges…look the reality is normandy’s armor is a bit too advanced for any AT rifle grenades to be of use
1 Like
Yeah but it’s for those ranges where you can’t get him with an explosion pack, I usually use explosion packs at close range though
1 Like
I mean your AT nade launcher
We have the M1 Garand w/nade launcher
Is the Kraut adjacent not the FG 42 with a nade launcher?
Mind you if it isn’t that, in my defense, I barely play any Krauts
I mean…I do like trolling Puma’s by killing them with a glorified impact nade though
sorry, but I can’t understand what exactly you are asking, can you rephrase that?
1 Like
They have one but it is for an event squad only with HE grenade. OP is comparing Kar98k with AT grenade with the M1 Garand with AT grenade.
I can understand the complain of having a bolt action rifle instead of a semi-auto, but the germans are compensating this in other area imo.
Gotcha
Could’ve SWORN I saw an FG with nade launcher in the TT, but I guess that’s just my memory for ya. Lol
Thought the Germans in Normandy unlocked an FG 42 w/nade launcher later in the TT, but it seems I was just misremembering
Still though, you’re complaining that Germany gets their main issue rifle with a nade launcher, meanwhile the US gets their main issue rifle with a nade launcher. Seems realistic more than anything to me. Just be glad it took till Nam for the M79 to be created, otherwise we’d be giving you death by dialup even faster. Lol
Anyways, I don’t really see the point in trying to argue for the Germans to get a different gun to put their AT nades on. They’re practically a gimmick anyways with them not working half the time, and the other half of the time you’re facing tanks too heavy to even damage with them. The Puma, Stuart, and both American TD’s are pretty much the only tanks vulnerable to them at all. Unless you really want them just in case, like I do on my AT Gunners, then just go with the better guns. AT weapons, TNT, and explosion packs will all get the job done much more effectively, and AT weapons all have either the same or better range than the nades
Yeah it isn’t a major thing, just want to have something better than the base rifle for my soldiers when I run out of ammo
1 Like
Pros and cons, ups and downs, takes and gives
This is the foundation of balancing
Do you take the bolt action w/nade launcher? Or do you take the full auto? That’s what makes each weapon choice unique, and what diversifies matches due to player loadouts changing due to the individual’s tastes and needs…even if Darkflow is trying to delete diversity by giving us BR’s that will make every match identical