Use any squad with a BR5 setup, and simply have your italian paratroopers in your lineup along with that squad… Or do you genuinely not understand how this game works?
It’s good to see you back after few weeks of Gulag i see their pro soviet bias brainwashing did not work on you as planned.
Gaijin doesn’t expect us to pick up Soviet weapons from their bodies and use it against them. Soon they may also remove that feature from the game as “it favours German players too much and it’s not fair”
1 Like
The BR III-IV loadout is almost using purely BR IV weapons. You should at least not giving Italians MG.
It is good to have more detailed loadouts according to BR, BUT, shouldn’t all players know it was a BR III-IV or BR II-III they got matchmaked clearly through somewhere like Tab?
There’s already plenty of exploits to make sure you have infinite Soviet ammo if you know what you’re doing so that is true in some ways.
And I’ve made friends with the Russians on the Russian forum so it’s not all bad in there but I hate having to use a translator but overall there are enemies on both sides but it’s not as prevalent as it is on this side.
1 Like
Yea, some people on the forum really dislike anything you say even if your post was still very tame compared to some of the biggest boos.
You really got an aura in here. XD
1 Like
And, since people are constantly mentioning customization in recent news (like the rewards is full of those green cards), when are you going to fix the once-again-broken customization?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/enlisted/i/Sh4kyRksZduH
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/enlisted/i/A3sg6bxQVCKg
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/enlisted/i/UcR49K2TMdTn
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/enlisted/i/uXoAoSiSAoL2
Seriously the fact that we have a Sniper M1 Garand in BR IV and a M1C Garand in BR III is silly.
13 Likes
It’s because I say things which they can’t argue against and I’m hurting the very fragile peace which they’re trying to keep.
And if you go back in the past and see the things I was talking about you’ll see that starting to pop up all over the forum and I didn’t say them in the exact ways but I already knew half the stuff was gonna happen I just didn’t know the exact pattern it would take.
it does, also, the polish BAR shares the same magazines as the american BAR despite them literally firing different calibers
there’s probably dozens upon dozens of magazine related errors
5 Likes
Please don’t give us SMGs for the assault class, most paras have them by default. Just give us LMGs reflective of the BR we’re playing at. 
1 Like
when will this be implemented
Would it REALLY be too difficult to give British squads British weapons as far as possible (looking at 1903 and Garand, Johnson and Hyde ffs…)? Even just this once??
4 Likes
Could be solved by giving large ammo pouch instead.
Though I think swapping sniper FG42 for Italians and scoped Stg for Germans would also make sense.
3 Likes
Please don’t, let the German paratroopers get their unique paratrooper weapons! Fallschirmjäger should have Fallschirmjäger weapons!
3 Likes
For the Japanese paratrooper set BR II-III, I personally would have preferred Type 100 SMG (late) instead of Type of 96 LMG. But, these are good changes nonetheless. 
1 Like
Overall like the changes! I would like to give my two cents:
Mortars:
Match the bigger mortars with the American/British BRs, and possibly balance BR 5 Mortars around squad size, like at BR 3-4 only 2 have it, and BR 4-5 3 squad members get it.
- Soviet would get the bigger mortar around BR 3-5 (RM-40)
- Germany would get the bigger mortar around BR 3-5 (Kz 8 cm GrW 42)
- Japan if we could add a new mortar for BR 4-5 that would be nice, otherwise maybe change it to flametroopers?
Snipers:
- Soviet
- BR 2-3, ideally a new sniper is added to fit this gap and to match the other nations snipers, but I don’t personally use snipers on Paras
- Japan
- Possibly add new sniper rife(s) to fit gaps, or change snipers to just a radio squad?
Assault:
This feedback mainly relates to Soviets having an arguably much better BR1-2 weapon than the other nations, but to me there is not really any other BR 1-2 gun they could use.
- Germany
- BR 1-2 MP-40
- America
- BR 1-2, change weapon to Owen, Lanchester or even the M1A1 Thomson if we want to match the theme, BR
- BR 3-4, change to Browning M1918A2
AT Gunner:
- America
- BR 1-2, change to M1 Bazooka
- Japan
- BR 1-2 change to Type 5 rocket launcher,
- BR 2-3 change to Type 4 rocket launcher
Behind the pay wall
1 Like
The number of weapons is the same or are there any changes? what about the extra loadout/equipment? Will the Italian paras finally get their 6 flamethrowers again?
Well short of being able to choose your own crate my thoughts are this.
With Paratroopers being such a unique unit (requiring purchase, or much time invested as they are not in tech tree) I think their crate loadouts could include old BP/Premium weapons to make thier kit “feel” more nation specific (not saying historically accurate). also a bit of advertising for when the weapons come around again in the store
Nation Specificity is my desire for Paras. (as much as possible)
Crates get way too risky the higher the BR you go…you are better off spawning your paras on the ground at high BR…
For example:
9 Likes
I think the assault section being SMG’s for BR1-2 is not a terrible idea compared to the bringing a BR3 LMG into a BR1-2 but…
I really don’t like the assault loadout giving a LMG one BR grouping and an SMG/AR next. I would much rather see a separate loadout for the two weapon types, particularly because their primary weapon is probably already going to be an SMG or an AR so if the assault loadout give you one of those you are are wasting a weapon slot practically do to sharing the ammo pool of one gun between two. Would like to reference german paratroopers locked primary shares ammo with FG 42 II sniper as i have seen from others might be a problem that would be pretty bad.
Won’t personally go into all the various weapons i would rather see in the boxes as many others have already addressed most of these in better detail than i could. but still wanted to express my opinion on this matter.