Honestly renaming the campaigns to east/west front would sooth a lot of autism and give them the freedom they are exercising.
and yeah, I heard from a little birdy another assault rifle is coming to moscow.
1 Like
Depends berlin has 3 map with 20 variation same as tunisia and normandy only moscow have a lot of map
no, axis are already at a disadvantage as soviets get ppsh and avs while axis have no full auto rifle. they should keep it
4 Likes
Maybe I am just blindly hopeful, that they will fix some of the errors that exist in game before (or if) we ever get to full release.
Mannlicher M1895 replaces the Kar98, Modello M28 replaces the Kar98K with Schiesbecher in Tunisia. Add M1918 SMG to replace one of the MP models.
Fix the StuG III in Normandy.
Plus all the other stuff mentioned above with Moscow.
Add in Romanian / Hungarian troops / weapons (though someone pulled the game files and I think the Hungarian SMG was in there, so Iâm hopeful).
1 Like
If it actually comes out for assaulters i am abandoning moscow for Berlin or going to HLL
If you talk about of the mp41 is a premium weapon given in a CBT (i dont recall wy) is not here anymore like the mosin m91 or the kar89k (trench mag)
Why remove it? It isnt historical sure but it isnt game breaking. Axis in moscow already dont have a weapon equal to the AVS36 and now the MKB 42 would go? Nah doesnt make sense
4 Likes
Oh I know those guns are out there in the world and for CBT and early backers of the game.
Iâm okay with those being here.
I have a few of my own in other games that I was an early backer on (WG, MWO etc).
Yeah⊠about that⊠darkflow removed it and all traces for a reason⊠lmao
2 Likes
In a campaign where Axis normally already struggle for a decent match no less
1 Like
âmainsâ just want the world and then some
Sadly i think it is to late to change most of what you mentioned. They dont seem to eager to change unlocks despite how much the community wants them to. This post here could get 200 likes and i still dont think they would change the mkb (case and point: fg 42 and jumbo)
1 Like
pz 3 L would be a decent counter, at least to t34, with the ability to pen KV1
with some angling it could be quite tough to pen, at least for the weaker L-11 gun
1 Like
Sadly, I know you are right, and I think that is the part that sucks the most sometimes.
2 Likes
And then you have the issue of every other axis tank basically not being usable.
+The pz3L would still fall behind, due to itâs 50mm having very meh HE. Compared to the T34 and kv1, which would tear apart infantry.
Moscow campaign is famous for the asymmetrical way of balancing where Russians would get god tier SMGs and Select fire rifles, the Axis would get better MGs and said Mkb42. In terms of nerfing the axis side again (which already suffers as ZH-29 is nerfed and easily loses to the AVS 36), wouldnât you think it would get problematic for balancing again? And do remember Sniper AVS is a select fire and a gewehr 41 is not, how do you balance that?
2 Likes
Damn yes
Btw, just reading through this,
Thatâs how you use them in warthunder. Using them like that in Enlisted is a good way to be a useless player and not even shoot anything down, as Enlisted IL-2s have a hitbox problem where you need to either pilot snipe or dump your whole mag into it to shoot it down.
Seems someone doesnât know how to use an IL-2. it can shoot down any axis fighter if flown well, it can take down tanks (though not as well), and it does better against infantry if you can aim the rockets. Stuka is only better at suicide rushing tanks.
Its a bomberâŠâŠ.
If you want to shoot down planes take an I153 or a YAK1. In regards to BOMBING the Stuka beats it by a wide margain
debatable
while the 250 kg is better for tanks the rockets are better against infantry as you can spread them over a large area
the only real advantage of the stuka is its anti tank capability, while IL2 is generally better aginst infantry and can defend itself very well, not needing anyone to take a fighter
1 Like